Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448357›Full record

ArticleMembranes2022

Preparation of Nano-TiO

Jie Zhang, Ming Zheng, Yun Zhou, Linlin Yang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Zhichao Wu, Guocong Liu, Junjian Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Membranes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Preparation and Characterization of PVDF/PVPylated-TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Preparation and Characterization of PVDF-TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jie ZhangSchool of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Huizhou University, 46 Yanda Road, Huizhou 516007, China.
Ming ZhengKey Laboratory of Organic Compound Pollution Control Engineering, School of Environmental and Chemical Engineering, Shanghai University, 333 Nanchen Road, Shanghai 200444, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3737-0577
Yun ZhouState Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Soil Health and Green Remediation, College of Resources and Environment, Huazhong Agricultural University, 1 Shizishan Street, Wuhan 430070, China.
Linlin YangCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 1 Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.
Yuanyuan ZhangCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 1 Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.
Zhichao WuState Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, China.
Guocong LiuSchool of Chemistry and Materials Engineering, Huizhou University, 46 Yanda Road, Huizhou 516007, China.
Junjian ZhengCollege of Life and Environmental Science, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, 1 Jinji Road, Guilin 541004, China.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-9719

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles have been applied in membrane antifouling performance modification for years. However, the influence of TiO2 nanoparticle dispersion status during the blending process on membrane properties and the inner mechanism has seldom been focused on. Herein, we investigated the influence of the various dispersing statuses of TiO2 nanoparticles on membrane properties and antifouling performance by exploring various blending processes without changing the original recipe. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) was employed as a pore-forming agent during the membrane preparation process, and also as a pre-dispersing agent for the TiO2 nanoparticles via the steric hindrance effect. Compared to the original preparation process of the PVDF/TiO2 composite membrane, the pre-dispersing of TiO2 via PEG ensured a modified membrane with uniform surface pores and structures on cross-sectional morphologies, larger porosity and water permeability, and more negative zeta potential. The contact angle was decreased by 6.0%, implying better hydrophilicity. The improved antifouling performance was corroborated by the increasing free energy of cohesion and adhesion, the interaction energy barrier (0.43 KT) between the membrane surfaces and approaching foulants assessed by classic XDLVO theory and the low flux decline in the filtration experiment. A kinetics mechanism analysis of the casting solutions, which found a low TSI value (<1.0), substantiated that the pre-dispersion of TiO2 with PEG contributed to the high stability and ultimately favorable antifouling behaviors. This study provides an optimized approach to the preparation of excellent nano-TiO2/polymeric composite membranes applied in the municipal sewage treatment field.

Indexed as

antifouling propertycomposite membranedispersionstabilityTiO2 nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID35448357
PMCPMC9025110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.