Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448274›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Direct Use of a Saliva-Collected Cotton Swab in Lateral Flow Immunoassay for the Detection of Cotinine.

Chaewon Jung, Mingon Kim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Chaewon JungDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physics and Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.
Mingon KimDepartment of Chemistry, School of Physics and Chemistry, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju 61005, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-3525-0048

Funding

Ministry of Science ICT and Future Planning H-GUARD_NRF-2019M3A6B2060097National Research Foundation of Korea NRF-2021R1A2B5B03001417
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The detection of salivary cotinine is useful for convenient smoking tests in spite of the high background effect of saliva. For precise results, the conventional salivary cotinine analysis for smoking detection requires complex pretreatment processes. Hence, in this study, we developed a modified paper-based lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA), termed "gap-LFIA", for the direct application of saliva collected using cotton swabs for on-site detection. The gap-LFIA was constructed by modifying a conventional LFIA sensor, where the sample pad was divided to have a 3 mm gap. A saliva-collected cotton swab was inserted into the gap, and then, a buffer solution was added to the outer sample pad to dilute the saliva automatically. The gap-LFIA reduced the interference in salivary samples and showed improved signals, allowing for using the whole saliva directly without additional steps. Further, the deviation of results using a strip was less than that when the saliva was not diluted in a conventional cotinine kit, and it helped to distinguish between smokers and non-smokers more clearly in 15 min. This method of automatic dilution may apply to various clinical samples, including blood and serum, for direct application in future detections.

Indexed as

CotinineSalivaImmunoassayImmunologic TestsSmokingCotininecotinine detectionlateral flow immunoassayon-site salivary testpoint of caresaliva testsmoking test

Identifiers

PMID35448274
PMCPMC9029424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.