Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448245›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

Robust PVC Identification by Fusing Expert System and Deep Learning.

Zhipeng Cai, Tiantian Wang, Yumin Shen, Yantao Xing, Ruqiang Yan, Jianqing Li, Chengyu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zhipeng CaiSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0003-3653-6838
Tiantian WangSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Yumin ShenSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Yantao XingSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-3451
Ruqiang YanSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Jianqing LiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 714009, China.
Chengyu LiuSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Southeast University · CNXi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

Distinguished Young Scholars of Jiangsu Province BK20190014National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFE0113800National Natural Science Foundation of China 62001105National Natural Science Foundation of China 62071241National Natural Science Foundation of China 81871444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Premature ventricular contraction (PVC) is one of the common ventricular arrhythmias, which may cause stroke or sudden cardiac death. Automatic long-term electrocardiogram (ECG) analysis algorithms could provide diagnosis suggestion and even early warning for physicians. However, they are mutually exclusive in terms of robustness, generalization and low complexity. In this study, a novel PVC recognition algorithm that combines deep learning-based heartbeat template clusterer and expert system-based heartbeat classifier is proposed. A long short-term memory-based auto-encoder (LSTM-AE) network was used to extract features from ECG heartbeats for K-means clustering. Thus, the templates were constructed and determined based on clustering results. Finally, the PVC heartbeats were recognized based on a combination of multiple rules, including template matching and rhythm characteristics. Three quantitative parameters, sensitivity (Se), positive predictive value (P+) and accuracy (ACC), were used to evaluate the performances of the proposed method on the MIT-BIH Arrhythmia database and the St. Petersburg Institute of Cardiological Technics database. Se on the two test databases was 87.51% and 87.92%, respectively; P+ was 92.47% and 93.18%, respectively; and ACC was 98.63% and 97.89%, respectively. The PVC scores on the third China Physiological Signal Challenge 2020 training set and hidden test set were 36,256 and 46,706, respectively, which could rank first in the open-source codes. The results showed that the combination strategy of expert system and deep learning can provide new insights for robust and generalized PVC identification from long-term single-lead ECG recordings.

Indexed as

Deep LearningVentricular Premature ComplexesAlgorithmsElectrocardiographyExpert SystemsHeart RateHumansSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedelectrocardiogramK-means clustering algorithmpremature ventricular contractionrule-based decision algorithm

Identifiers

PMID35448245
PMCPMC9025768
OpenAlexW4221089782

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.