ArticleJournal of imaging2022
Convolutional Neural Networks for the Identification of African Lions from Individual Vocalizations.
Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation.Biologia futura · 2026Review
- Music genre classification with parallel convolutional neural networks and capuchin search algorithm.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Elephants and algorithms: a review of the current and future role of AI in elephant monitoring.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The classification of vocal individuality for passive acoustic monitoring (PAM) and census of animals is becoming an increasingly popular area of research. Nearly all studies in this field of inquiry have relied on classic audio representations and classifiers, such as Support Vector Machines (SVMs) trained on spectrograms or Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs). In contrast, most current bioacoustic species classification exploits the power of deep learners and more cutting-edge audio representations. A significant reason for avoiding deep learning in vocal identity classification is the tiny sample size in the collections of labeled individual vocalizations. As is well known, deep learners require large datasets to avoid overfitting. One way to handle small datasets with deep learning methods is to use transfer learning. In this work, we evaluate the performance of three pretrained CNNs (VGG16, ResNet50, and AlexNet) on a small, publicly available lion roar dataset containing approximately 150 samples taken from five male lions. Each of these networks is retrained on eight representations of the samples: MFCCs, spectrogram, and Mel spectrogram, along with several new ones, such as VGGish and stockwell, and those based on the recently proposed LM spectrogram. The performance of these networks, both individually and in ensembles, is analyzed and corroborated using the Equal Error Rate and shown to surpass previous classification attempts on this dataset; the best single network achieved over 95% accuracy and the best ensembles over 98% accuracy. The contributions this study makes to the field of individual vocal classification include demonstrating that it is valuable and possible, with caution, to use transfer learning with single pretrained CNNs on the small datasets available for this problem domain. We also make a contribution to bioacoustics generally by offering a comparison of the performance of many state-of-the-art audio representations, including for the first time the LM spectrogram and stockwell representations. All source code for this study is available on GitHub.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.