Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448217›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging2022

Object Categorization Capability of Psychological Potential Field in Perceptual Assessment Using Line-Drawing Images.

Naoyuki Awano, Yuki Hayashi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Naoyuki AwanoFaculty of Business, Kokushikan University, 4-28-1 Setagaya, Setagaya-ku, Tokyo 154-8515, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8327-0310
Yuki HayashiGraduate School of Humanities and Sustainable System Sciences, Osaka Prefecture University, 1-1 Gakuen-cho, Naka-ku, Sakai 599-8531, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-2182
Kokushikan University · JPOsaka Prefecture University · JP

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 21K12098
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affective/cognitive engineering investigations typically require the quantitative assessment of object perception. Recent research has suggested that certain perceptions of object categorization can be derived from human eye fixation and that color images and line drawings induce similar neural activities. Line drawings contain less information than color images; therefore, line drawings are expected to simplify the investigations of object perception. The psychological potential field (PPF), which is a psychological feature, is an image feature of line drawings. On the basis of the PPF, the possibility that the general human perception of object categorization can be assessed from the similarity to fixation maps (FMs) generated from human eye fixations has been reported. However, this may be due to chance because image features other than the PPF have not been compared with FMs. This study examines the potential and effectiveness of the PPF by comparing its performance with that of other image features in terms of the similarity to FMs. The results show that the PPF shows the ideal performance for assessing the perception of object categorization. In particular, the PPF effectively distinguishes between animal and nonanimal targets; however, real-time assessment is difficult.

Indexed as

eye trackingfixation mapline drawingperceptual assessmentpsychological potential field

Identifiers

PMID35448217
PMCPMC9026922
OpenAlexW4220897781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.