Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448184›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

The Learning Curve and Inter-Observer Variability in Contouring the Hippocampus under the Hippocampal Sparing Guidelines of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0933.

Monika Konopka-Filippow, Ewa Sierko, Dominika Hempel, Rafał Maksim, Natalia Samołyk-Kogaczewska, Tomasz Filipowski, Ewa Rożkowska, Stefan Jelski, Beata Kasprowicz, Eryka Karbowska and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Monika Konopka-FilippowDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.
Ewa SierkoDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-6661-3182
Dominika HempelDepartment of Oncology, Medical University of Bialystok, 15-089 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0587-9790
Rafał MaksimDepartment of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Natalia Samołyk-KogaczewskaDepartment of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9261-5728
Tomasz FilipowskiDepartment of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Ewa RożkowskaDepartment of Radiotherapy I, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Stefan JelskiDepartment of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Beata KasprowiczDepartment of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Eryka KarbowskaDepartment of Radiology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Bialystok Oncology Centre, 15-027 Białystok, Poland.
Krzysztof SzymańskiDepartment of Physics, University of Bialystok, 15-245 Białystok, Poland.
Kamil SzczecinaDepartment of Physics, University of Bialystok, 15-245 Białystok, Poland.
Medical University of Białystok · PLUniversity of Białystok · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hippocampal-sparing brain radiotherapy (HS-BRT) in cancer patients results in preservation of neurocognitive function after brain RT which can contribute to patients' quality of life (QoL). The crucial element in HS-BRT treatment planning is appropriate contouring of the hippocampus. Ten doctors delineated the left and right hippocampus (LH and RH, respectively) on 10 patients' virtual axial images of brain CT fused with T1-enhanced MRI (1 mm) according to the RTOG 0933 atlas recommendations. Variations in the spatial localization of the structure were described in three directions: right-left (X), cranio-caudal (Y), and forward-backward (Z). Discrepancies concerned three-dimensional localization, shape, volume and size of the hippocampus. The largest differences were observed in the first three delineated cases which were characterized by larger hippocampal volumes than the remaining seven cases. The volumes of LH of more than half of hippocampus contours were marginally bigger than those of RH. Most differences in delineation of the hippocampus were observed in the area of the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle. Conversely, a large number of hippocampal contours overlapped near the brainstem and the anterior horn of the lateral ventricle. The most problematic area of hippocampal contouring is the posterior horn of the lateral ventricle. Training in the manual contouring of the hippocampus during HS-BRT treatment planning under the supervision of experienced radiation oncologists is necessary to achieve optimal outcomes. This would result in superior outcomes of HS-BRT treatment and improvement in QoL of patients compared to without HS-BRT procedure. Correct delineation of the hippocampus is problematic. This study demonstrates difficulties in HS-BRT treatment planning and highlights critical points during hippocampus delineation.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedHippocampusHumansLearning CurveObserver Variationbrain radiotherapycontouringhippocampal avoidancehippocampal sparinglearning curveRTOG delineation atlas

Identifiers

PMID35448184
PMCPMC9027685
OpenAlexW4224257910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.