Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448153›Full record

ArticleCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.)2022

The Clinical Impact of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Treatment on Luminal-like Breast Cancers and Its Prognostic Significance: Results from a Single-Institution Prospective Cohort Study.

Covadonga Martí, Laura Yébenes, José María Oliver, Elisa Moreno, Laura Frías, Alberto Berjón, Adolfo Loayza, Marcos Meléndez, María José Roca, Vicenta Córdoba and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Covadonga MartíBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Laura YébenesBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
José María OliverBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Elisa MorenoBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0631-2959
Laura FríasBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Alberto BerjónBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Adolfo LoayzaBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Marcos MeléndezBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
María José RocaBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
Vicenta CórdobaBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
David HardissonBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2183-3699
María Ángeles RodríguezBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.
José Ignacio Sánchez-MéndezBreast Cancer Unit, Hospital Universitario La Paz, 28046 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2559-2500
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) has become a useful tool for the downstaging of luminal-like breast cancers in postmenopausal patients. It enables us to increase breast- conserving surgery (BCS) rates, provides an opportunity for us to assess in vivo NET effectiveness, and allows us to study any biological changes that may act as valid biomarkers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of NET, and to assess the role of Ki67 proliferation rate changes as an indicator of endocrine responsiveness. Methods: From 2016 to 2020, a single-institution cohort of patients, treated with NET and further surgery, was evaluated. In patients with Ki67 ≥ 10%, a second core biopsy was performed after four weeks. Information regarding histopathological and clinical changes was gathered. Results: A total of 115 estrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2-negative patients were included. The median treatment duration was 5.0 months (IQR: 2.0−6.0). The median maximum size in the surgical sample was 40% smaller than the pretreatment size measured by ultrasound (p < 0.0001). The median pretreatment Ki67 expression was 20.0% (IQR: 12.0−30.0), and was reduced to 5.0% (IQR: 1.8−10.0) after four weeks, and to 2.0% (IQR: 1.0−8.0) in the surgical sample (p < 0.0001). BCS was performed on 98 patients (85.2%). No pathological complete responses were recorded. A larger Ki67 fold change after four weeks was significantly related to a PEPI score of zero (p < 0.002). No differences were observed between luminal A- and B-like tumors, with regard to fold change and PEPI score. Conclusions: In our cohort, NET was proven to be effective for tumor size and Ki67 downstaging. This resulted in a higher rate of conservative surgery, aided in therapeutic decision making, provided prognostic information, and constituted a safe and well-tolerated approach.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenPrognosisProspective StudiesKi-67 Antigenbreast cancerendocrine therapyneoadjuvantresistance

Identifiers

PMID35448153
PMCPMC9026529
OpenAlexW4225716319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.