Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448140›Full record

ReviewGels (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comprehensive Assessment on the Pivotal Role of Hydrogels in Scaffold-Based Bioprinting.

Matangi Parimala Chelvi Ratnamani, Xinping Zhang, Hongjun Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Matangi Parimala Chelvi RatnamaniDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Xinping ZhangDepartment of Orthopaedics, Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
Hongjun WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3455-8523
Stevens Institute of Technology · USUniversity of Rochester Medical Center · US

Funding

Micro- and nanofiber enabled biomimetic periosteum for bone repair and reconstructionR01AR067859 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI WANG, HONGJUN, ZHANG, XINPING · 2016 to 2020
$2.7M
Endothelial cell specification at the osteogenic and angiogenic interface in cranial bone tissue engineeringR01DE029790 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI ZHANG, XINPING · 2020 to 2025
$2.7M
Engineering structural bone allografts for enhanced repair and reconstructionR21AR076056 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER · PI XIE, JINGWEI, ZHANG, XINPING · 2020 to 2021
$365k
NIAMS NIH HHS 1R01AR067859NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067859NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR076056NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029790
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The past a few decades have seen exponential growth in the field of regenerative medicine. What began as extirpative (complete tissue or organ removal), with little regard to the effects of tissue loss and/or disfigurement, has evolved towards fabricating engineered tissues using personalized living cells (e.g., stem cells), and customizing a matrix or structural organization to support and guide tissue development. Biofabrication, largely accomplished through three-dimensional (3D) printing technology, provides precise, controlled, and layered assemblies of cells and biomaterials, emulating the heterogenous microenvironment of the in vivo tissue architecture. This review provides a concise framework for the bio-manufacturing process and addresses the contributions of hydrogels to biological modeling. The versatility of hydrogels in bioprinting is detailed along with an extensive elaboration of their physical, mechanical, and biological properties, as well as their assets and limitations in bioprinting. The scope of various hydrogels in tissue formation has been discussed through the case studies of biofabricated 3D constructs in order to provide the readers with a glimpse into the barrier-breaking accomplishments of biomedical sciences. In the end, the restraints of bioprinting itself are discussed, accompanied with the identification of available engineering strategies to overcome them.

Indexed as

3D bioprintingbioprinting limitationhydrogel characterizationhydrogel matrixlayer-by-layer assemblageliving cellsstrategies

Identifiers

PMID35448140
PMCPMC9028353
OpenAlexW4223922381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.