Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448107›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Targeted Printing of Cells: Evaluation of ADA-PEG Bioinks for Drop on Demand Approaches.

Emine Karakaya, Faina Bider, Andreas Frank, Jörg Teßmar, Lisa Schöbel, Leonard Forster, Stefan Schrüfer, Hans-Werner Schmidt, Dirk Wolfram Schubert, Andreas Blaeser and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Emine KarakayaDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Faina BiderDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5898-4802
Andreas FrankMacromolecular Chemistry I and Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI), University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.
Jörg TeßmarDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry and Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI), University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7057-5369
Lisa SchöbelDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0391-4089
Leonard ForsterDepartment of Functional Materials in Medicine and Dentistry and Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI), University of Würzburg, Pleicherwall 2, 97070 Würzburg, Germany.
Stefan SchrüferDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Polymer Materials, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martenstraße 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Hans-Werner SchmidtMacromolecular Chemistry I and Bavarian Polymer Institute (BPI), University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstrasse 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1761-1153
Dirk Wolfram SchubertDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Polymer Materials, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Martenstraße 7, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.
Andreas BlaeserDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, BioMedical Printing Technology, Technical University of Darmstadt, Magdalenenstr. 2, 64289 Darmstadt, Germany.
Aldo R BoccacciniDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7377-2955
Rainer DetschDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, Institute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

German Research Foundation 326998133 - TRR 225 (sub-project B06)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A novel approach, in the context of bioprinting, is the targeted printing of a defined number of cells at desired positions in predefined locations, which thereby opens up new perspectives for life science engineering. One major challenge in this application is to realize the targeted printing of cells onto a gel substrate with high cell survival rates in advanced bioinks. For this purpose, different alginate-dialdehyde-polyethylene glycol (ADA-PEG) inks with different PEG modifications and chain lengths (1-8 kDa) were characterized to evaluate their application as bioinks for drop on demand (DoD) printing. The biochemical properties of the inks, printing process, NIH/3T3 fibroblast cell distribution within a droplet and shear forces during printing were analyzed. Finally, different hydrogels were evaluated as a printing substrate. By analysing different PEG chain lengths with covalently crosslinked and non-crosslinked ADA-PEG inks, it was shown that the influence of Schiff's bases on the viscosity of the corresponding materials is very low. Furthermore, it was shown that longer polymer chains resulted in less stable hydrogels, leading to fast degradation rates. Several bioinks highly exhibit biocompatibility, while the calculated nozzle shear stress increased from approx. 1.3 and 2.3 kPa. Moreover, we determined the number of cells for printed droplets depending on the initial cell concentration, which is crucially needed for targeted cell printing approaches.

Indexed as

bioprintingdrop on demandpolyethylene glycolshear stresssodium alginate

Identifiers

PMID35448107
PMCPMC9032277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.