Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35448023›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Dysarthria Subgroups in Talkers with Huntington's Disease: Comparison of Two Data-Driven Classification Approaches.

Daniel Kim, Sarah Diehl, Michael de Riesthal, Kris Tjaden, Stephen M Wilson, Daniel O Claassen, Antje S Mefferd

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel KimDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9390-672X
Sarah DiehlDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Michael de RiesthalDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Kris TjadenDepartment of Communicative Disorders and Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14260, USA.
Stephen M WilsonDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9884-2852
Daniel O ClaassenDepartment of Neurology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9853-4902
Antje S MefferdDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USUniversity at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Neural Correlates of Recovery from Aphasia After StrokeR01DC013270 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Stephen M Wilson, Michael R de Riesthal · 2014 to 2026
$6.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC013270Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research (VICTR) VR54217
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although researchers have recognized the need to better account for the heterogeneous perceptual speech characteristics among talkers with the same disease, guidance on how to best establish such dysarthria subgroups is currently lacking. Therefore, we compared subgroup decisions of two data-driven approaches based on a cohort of talkers with Huntington's disease (HD): (1) a statistical clustering approach (STATCLUSTER) based on perceptual speech characteristic profiles and (2) an auditory free classification approach (FREECLASS) based on listeners' similarity judgments. We determined the amount of overlap across the two subgrouping decisions and the perceptual speech characteristics driving the subgrouping decisions of each approach. The same speech samples produced by 48 talkers with HD were used for both grouping approaches. The STATCLUSTER approach had been conducted previously. The FREECLASS approach was conducted in the present study. Both approaches yielded four dysarthria subgroups, which overlapped between 50% to 78%. In both grouping approaches, overall bizarreness and speech rate characteristics accounted for the grouping decisions. In addition, voice abnormalities contributed to the grouping decisions in the FREECLASS approach. These findings suggest that apart from overall bizarreness ratings, indexing dysarthria severity, speech rate and voice characteristics may be important features to establish dysarthria subgroups in HD.

Indexed as

auditory free classificationdysarthriaperceptual speech assessmentperceptual speech characteristics

Identifiers

PMID35448023
PMCPMC9025673
OpenAlexW4224098742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.