Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447884›Full record

ArticleInfectious disease reports2022

Evaluating the Use of Dalbavancin for Off-Label Indications.

Katherine Taylor, John Williamson, Vera Luther, Tyler Stone, James Johnson, Zachary Gruss, Courtney Russ-Friedman, Chris Ohl, James Beardsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infectious disease reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Dalbavancin for infective endocarditis: A systematic review of effectiveness, safety, and dosing.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Katherine TaylorWake Forest Baptist Health Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4819-5508
John WilliamsonWake Forest Baptist Health Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Vera LutherSection of Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Tyler StoneWake Forest Baptist Health Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
James JohnsonWake Forest Baptist Health Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Zachary GrussProMedica Toledo Hospital Department of Pharmacy, Toledo, OH 43606, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6238-0331
Courtney Russ-FriedmanSection of Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
Chris OhlSection of Infectious Diseases, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
James BeardsleyWake Forest Baptist Health Department of Pharmacy, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3900-8758

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Dalbavancin is a long-acting lipoglycopeptide antibiotic approved for skin and soft-tissue infections. Post-marketing experience suggests dalbavancin is being used for off-label indications that normally require long-term intravenous (IV) antibiotics; however, data assessing this off-label usage are limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the real-world efficacy, safety, and financial impact of off-label dalbavancin use. (2) Methods: This is a retrospective, observational study conducted within a 4-hospital health system. Adult patients who received dalbavancin from January 2018 to January 2021 for an off-label indication were included. The primary outcome was clinical success at 90 days. Secondary outcomes included safety (nephrotoxicity and hepatotoxicity). A pharmacoeconomic analysis was performed by comparing the cost of dalbavancin to the anticipated cost of patient stay if standard IV therapy was given. (3) Results: Forty-eight patients met study criteria. Indications included osteomyelitis (54%), endocarditis (23%), bacteremia (15%), and prosthetic joint infection (8%). The predominant organism was

Indexed as

bacteremiacohort studiesdalbavancinendocarditishistoricalosteomyelitispharmacoeconomics

Identifiers

PMID35447884
PMCPMC9026399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.