ArticleInsects2022
Population Genetic Structure of
Article in Insects, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Population genetic diversity and structure of Tephritis angustipennis and Campiglossa loewiana (Diptera: Tephritidae) based on COI DNA barcodes in the three-river source region, China.Journal of insect science (Online) · 2024Article
- Phylogeography and Genetic Structure of the Bush CricketZoological studies · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Frequent outbreaks have made Chlorops oryzae one of the major pests of rice in some regions. In order to understand the ecological adaptation of C. oryzae at the molecular level, and provide a scientific basis for formulating management strategies, we used two molecular markers, COI and ITS1 sequences, to systematically analyze the genetic structure of 31 populations. The higher haplotype diversity and lower nucleotide diversity indicated that the C. oryzae populations experienced rapid expansion after a “Bottleneck effect”. The results of the mismatch distribution, neutrality test (Fu’s Fs < 0, p < 0.001), and haplotype network analysis suggested that the population has recently undergone an expansion. Although genetic differentiation among C. oryzae populations was found to have existed at low/medium levels (Fst: 0.183 for COI, 0.065 for ITS1), the frequent gene flow presented as well (Nm: 2.23 for COI, 3.60 for ITS1) was supposed to be responsible for frequent local outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.