ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022
A Comparison of Heart Pulsations Provided by Forcecardiography and Double Integration of Seismocardiogram.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical Readiness of Hemodynamic Estimation from Cardiac Vibration Signals: An Endpoint-Specific Critical Review.Annals of biomedical engineering · 2026Review
- An Analytical Model of Motion Artifacts in a Measured Arterial Pulse Signal-Part I: Accelerometers and PPG Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fully automated template matching method for ECG-free heartbeat detection in cardiomechanical signals of healthy and pathological subjects.Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2025Article
- A Narrowband IoT Personal Sensor for Long-Term Heart Rate Monitoring and Atrial Fibrillation Detection.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Accurate Localization of First and Second Heart Sounds via Template Matching in Forcecardiography Signals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- ECG-Free Heartbeat Detection in Seismocardiography and Gyrocardiography Signals Provides Acceptable Heart Rate Variability Indices in Healthy and Pathological Subjects.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Heartbeat Detection in Gyrocardiography Signals without Concurrent ECG Tracings.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- ECG-Free Heartbeat Detection in Seismocardiography Signals via Template Matching.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Design and Fabrication of an Integrated Hollow Concave Cilium MEMS Cardiac Sound Sensor.Micromachines · 2022Article
- Changes in Forcecardiography Heartbeat Morphology Induced by Cardio-Respiratory Interactions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Multimodal Finger Pulse Wave Sensing: Comparison of Forcecardiography and Photoplethysmography Sensors.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Respiratory-Induced Amplitude Modulation of Forcecardiography Signals.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Seismocardiography (SCG) is largely regarded as the state-of-the-art technique for continuous, long-term monitoring of cardiac mechanical activity in wearable applications. SCG signals are acquired via small, lightweight accelerometers fixed on the chest. They provide timings of important cardiac events, such as heart valves openings and closures, thus allowing the estimation of cardiac time intervals of clinical relevance. Forcecardiography (FCG) is a novel technique that records the cardiac-induced vibrations of the chest wall by means of specific force sensors, which proved capable of monitoring respiration, heart sounds and infrasonic cardiac vibrations, simultaneously from a single contact point on the chest. A specific infrasonic component captures the heart walls displacements and looks very similar to the Apexcardiogram. This low-frequency component is not visible in SCG recordings, nor it can be extracted by simple filtering. In this study, a feasible way to extract this information from SCG signals is presented. The proposed approach is based on double integration of SCG. Numerical double integration is usually very prone to large errors, therefore a specific numerical procedure was devised. This procedure yields a new displacement signal (DSCG) that features a low-frequency component (LF-DSCG) very similar to that of the FCG (LF-FCG). Experimental tests were carried out using an FCG sensor and an off-the-shelf accelerometer firmly attached to each other and placed onto the precordial region. Simultaneous recordings were acquired from both sensors, together with an electrocardiogram lead (used as a reference). Quantitative morphological comparison confirmed the high similarity between LF-FCG and LF-DSCG (normalized cross-correlation index >0.9). Statistical analyses suggested that LF-DSCG, although achieving a fair sensitivity in heartbeat detection (about 90%), has not a very high consistency within the cardiac cycle, leading to inaccuracies in inter-beat intervals estimation. Future experiments with high-performance accelerometers and improved processing methods are envisioned to investigate the potential enhancement of the accuracy and reliability of the proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.