Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447705›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Implant Periapical Lesion: Clinical and Histological Analysis of Two Case Reports Carried Out with Two Different Approaches.

Roberto Luongo, Fabio Faustini, Alessandro Vantaggiato, Giuseppe Bianco, Tonino Traini, Antonio Scarano, Eugenio Pedullà, Calogero Bugea

Abstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Dental Restorations.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Roberto LuongoIndependent Researcher, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7731-218X
Fabio FaustiniIndependent Researcher, 29020 Piacenza, Italy.
Alessandro VantaggiatoIndependent Researcher, 73100 Lecce, Italy.
Giuseppe BiancoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.
Tonino TrainiDepartment of Innovative Technologies in Medicine & Dentistry, University of "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0265-8709
Antonio ScaranoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University of "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1374-6146
Eugenio PedullàDepartment of General Surgery and Surgical-Medical Specialties, University of Catania, 95100 Catania, Italy.
Calogero BugeaIndependent Researcher, 73100 Lecce, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9960-9830

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Periapical implantitis (IPL) is an increasingly frequent complication of dental implants. The causes of this condition are not yet entirely clear, although a bacterial component is certainly part of the etiology. In this case series study, two approaches will be described: because of persistent IPL symptoms, a patient had the implant removed and underwent histological analysis after week 6 from implantation. The histomorphometric examination revealed a 35% bone-implant contact area involving the coronal two-thirds of the implant. The apical portion of the fixture on the other hand was affected by an inflammatory process detectable on radiography as a radiolucent area. The presence of a probable root fragment, detectable as an imprecise radiopaque mass in the zone where the implant was later placed, confirms the probable bacterial etiology of this case of IPL. On the other hand, in case number 2, the presence of IPL around the fixture was solved by surgically removing the implant apical third as well as the adjacent tooth apex. It may be concluded from our histological examination that removal of the apical portion of the fixture should be considered an effective treatment for IPL since the remaining implant segment remains optimally osseointegrated and capable of continuing its function as a prosthetic abutment. Careful attention, however, is required at the implantation planning stage to identify in advance any sources of infection in the edentulous area of interest which might compromise the final outcome.

Indexed as

complicationendodontic surgeryimplant failureimplant periapical lesionperi-implantitis

Identifiers

PMID35447705
PMCPMC9030256

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.