Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447673›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Critical Competences for the Management of Post-Operative Course in Patients with Digestive Tract Cancer: The Contribution of MADIT Methodology for a Nine-Month Longitudinal Study.

Eleonora Pinto, Alessandro Fabbian, Rita Alfieri, Anna Da Roit, Salvatore Marano, Genny Mattara, Pierluigi Pilati, Carlo Castoro, Marco Cavarzan, Marta Silvia Dalla Riva and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nestin Expression and the Survival of Patients With Digestive Tract Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Eleonora PintoSurgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5404-5958
Alessandro FabbianDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6053-4774
Rita AlfieriSurgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4993-2197
Anna Da RoitDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Salvatore MaranoDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Genny MattaraSurgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Pierluigi PilatiSurgical Oncology of the Esophagus and Digestive Tract, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Carlo CastoroDivision of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy.
Marco CavarzanDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.
Marta Silvia Dalla RivaDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5593-364X
Luisa OrrùDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1661-6227
Gian Piero TurchiDepartment of Philosophy, Sociology, Pedagogy and Applied Psychology, University of Padua, 35131 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2154-5339

Funding

University of Padua Unimpresa2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a high postoperative morbidity rate after cancer surgery, that impairs patients’ self-management, job condition and economic strength. This paper describes the results of a peculiar psychological intervention on patients undergoing surgery for esophageal, gastric and colorectal cancer. The intervention aimed to enhance patients’ competences in the management of postoperative daily life. A narrative approach (M.A.D.I.T.—Methodology for the Analysis of Computerised Text Data) was used to create a questionnaire, Health and Employment after Gastro-Intestinal Surgery—Dialogical Questionnaire, HEAGIS-DQ, that assesses four competences. It was administered to 48 participants. Results were used as guidance for specific intervention, structured on patients’ competence profiles. The intervention lasted nine months after surgery and was structured in weekly to monthly therapeutic sessions. Quality of Life questionnaires were administered too. At the end of the intervention, 94% of patients maintained their job and only 10% of patients asked for financial support. The mean self-perception of health-related quality of life was 71.2. The distribution of three of four competences increased after nine months (p < 0.05). Despite economic difficulties due to lasting symptoms after surgery, and to the current pandemic scenario, a structured intervention with patients let them to resume their jobs and continue activities after surgery.

Indexed as

financial toxicityhealthMADIT methodologynarrative methodoncological surgerypsychological interventionquality of life

Identifiers

PMID35447673
PMCPMC9029589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.