Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447169›Full record

ArticleThe Science of the total environment2022

Characterizing firefighter's exposure to over 130 SVOCs using silicone wristbands: A pilot study comparing on-duty and off-duty exposures.

Jessica L Levasseur, Kate Hoffman, Nicholas J Herkert, Ellen Cooper, Duncan Hay, Heather M Stapleton

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Science of the total environment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jessica L LevasseurNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: jessica.levasseur@duke.edu.
Kate HoffmanNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: kate.hoffman@duke.edu.
Nicholas J HerkertNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: nicholas.herkert@duke.edu.
Ellen CooperNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: ellen.cooper@duke.edu.
Duncan HayNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: duncan.hay@duke.edu.
Heather M StapletonNicholas School of Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States. Electronic address: heather.stapleton@duke.edu.

Funding

Untargeted Analysis ResourceU2CES030857 · NIEHS · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI FENNELL, TIMOTHY RAYMOND · 2019 to 2025
$8.1M
Research CoreU2CES030851 · NIEHS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI STAPLETON, HEATHER M · 2019 to 2025
$6.0M
NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030851NIEHS NIH HHS U2C ES030857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Firefighters are occupationally exposed to an array of hazardous chemicals, and these exposures have been linked to the higher rates of some cancer in firefighters. However, additional research that characterizes firefighters' exposure is needed to fully elucidate the impacts on health risks. In this pilot study, we used silicone wristbands to quantify off-duty and on-duty chemical exposures experienced by 20 firefighters in Durham, North Carolina. By using each firefighter's off-duty wristband to represent individual baseline exposures, we assessed occupation-related exposures (i.e. on-duty exposures). We also investigated the influence of responding to a fire event while on-duty. In total, 134 chemicals were quantified using both GC-MS and LC-MS/MS targeted methods. Seventy-one chemicals were detected in at least 50% of all silicone wristbands, including 7 PFAS, which to our knowledge, have not been reported in wristbands previously. Of these, phthalates were generally measured at the highest concentrations, followed by brominated flame retardants (BFRs) and organophosphate esters (OPEs). PFAS were measured at lower concentrations overall, but firefighter PFOS exposures while on-duty and responding to fires were 2.5 times higher than off-duty exposures. Exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), BFRs, and some OPEs were occupationally associated, with firefighters experiencing 0.5 to 8.5 times higher exposure while on-duty as compared to off-duty. PAH exposures were also higher for firefighters who respond to a fire than those who did not while on-duty. Additional research with a larger population of firefighters that builds upon this pilot investigation may further pinpoint exposure sources that may contribute to firefighters' risk for cancer, such as those from firefighter gear or directly from fires. This research demonstrates the utility of using silicone wristbands to quantify occupational exposure in firefighters and the ability to disentangle exposures that may be specific to fire events as opposed to other sources that firefighters might experience.

Indexed as

Air Pollutants, OccupationalFirefightersFiresFlame RetardantsFluorocarbonsNeoplasmsOccupational ExposurePolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsChromatography, LiquidHumansOrganophosphatesPilot ProjectsSiliconesTandem Mass SpectrometryAir Pollutants, OccupationalFlame RetardantsFluorocarbonsOrganophosphatesPolycyclic Aromatic HydrocarbonsSiliconesExposureFirefighterOn-dutyPAHsPFASWristband

Identifiers

PMID35447169
PMCPMC9728008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.