Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447083›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2022

Heterochromatic repeat clustering imposes a physical barrier on homologous recombination to prevent chromosomal translocations.

Ioanna Mitrentsi, Jieqiong Lou, Adèle Kerjouan, John Verigos, Bernardo Reina-San-Martin, Elizabeth Hinde, Evi Soutoglou

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Hidden origami inmBio · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Ioanna MitrentsiInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Illkirch, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1258, Illkirch, France; Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR7104, Illkirch, France; Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Jieqiong LouSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Adèle KerjouanSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
John VerigosGenome Damage and Stability Centre, Sussex University, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK.
Bernardo Reina-San-MartinInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Illkirch, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1258, Illkirch, France; Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR7104, Illkirch, France; Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Elizabeth HindeSchool of Physics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Department of Biochemistry and Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Evi SoutoglouInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), Illkirch, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), U1258, Illkirch, France; Centre National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), UMR7104, Illkirch, France; Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France; Genome Damage and Stability Centre, Sussex University, School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, BN1 9RH, UK. Electronic address: e.soutoglou@sussex.ac.uk.
University of Melbourne · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Sussex · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mouse pericentromeric DNA is composed of tandem major satellite repeats, which are heterochromatinized and cluster together to form chromocenters. These clusters are refractory to DNA repair through homologous recombination (HR). The mechanisms by which pericentromeric heterochromatin imposes a barrier on HR and the implications of repeat clustering are unknown. Here, we compare the spatial recruitment of HR factors upon double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) induced in human and mouse pericentromeric heterochromatin, which differ in their capacity to form clusters. We show that while DSBs increase the accessibility of human pericentromeric heterochromatin by disrupting HP1α dimerization, mouse pericentromeric heterochromatin repeat clustering imposes a physical barrier that requires many layers of de-compaction to be accessed. Our results support a model in which the 3D organization of heterochromatin dictates the spatial activation of DNA repair pathways and is key to preventing the activation of HR within clustered repeats and the onset of chromosomal translocations.

Indexed as

HeterochromatinTranslocation, GeneticAnimalsCluster AnalysisDNA Breaks, Double-StrandedHomologous RecombinationMiceHeterochromatinDNA repairHP1αHRpericentromeric heterochromatinRad51

Identifiers

PMID35447083
PMCPMC9616805
OpenAlexW4225926383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.