Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35447066›Full record

ArticleEmerging infectious diseases2022

Effects of Tick-Control Interventions on Tick Abundance, Human Encounters with Ticks, and Incidence of Tickborne Diseases in Residential Neighborhoods, New York, USA.

Felicia Keesing, Stacy Mowry, William Bremer, Shannon Duerr, Andrew S Evans, Ilya R Fischhoff, Alison F Hinckley, Sarah A Hook, Fiona Keating, Jennifer Pendleton and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Emerging infectious diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Why are the ticks winning, and what can we do about it?Ticks and tick-borne diseases · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felicia Keesing
Stacy Mowry
William Bremer
Shannon Duerr
Andrew S Evans
Ilya R Fischhoff
Alison F Hinckley
Sarah A Hook
Fiona Keating
Jennifer Pendleton
Ashley Pfister
Marissa Teator
Richard S Ostfeld
Cary Institute of Ecosystem Studies · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USBard College · USDutchess Community College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tickborne diseases (TBDs) such as Lyme disease result in ≈500,000 diagnoses annually in the United States. Various methods can reduce the abundance of ticks at small spatial scales, but whether these methods lower incidence of TBDs is poorly understood. We conducted a randomized, replicated, fully crossed, placebo-controlled, masked experiment to test whether 2 environmentally safe interventions, the Tick Control System (TCS) and Met52 fungal spray, used separately or together, affected risk for and incidence of TBDs in humans and pets in 24 residential neighborhoods. All participating properties in a neighborhood received the same treatment. TCS was associated with fewer questing ticks and fewer ticks feeding on rodents. The interventions did not result in a significant difference in incidence of human TBDs but did significantly reduce incidence in pets. Our study is consistent with previous evidence suggesting that reducing tick abundance in residential areas might not reduce incidence of TBDs in humans.

Indexed as

IxodesLyme DiseaseTick-Borne DiseasesTicksAnimalsHumansIncidenceNew YorkTick ControlUnited StatesbacteriaIxodes scapularisLyme diseaseNew Yorkpreventiontickborne diseaseticksUnited Statesvector-borne infectionszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35447066
PMCPMC9045441
OpenAlexW4224236729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.