Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446922›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Masks, money, and mandates: A national survey on efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination intentions in the United States.

Rikki H Sargent, Shaelyn Laurie, Leah Moncada, Leo F Weakland, James V Lavery, Daniel A Salmon, Walter A Orenstein, Robert F Breiman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Coronavirus Disease-2019 Vaccine Hesitancy.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rikki H SargentRIWI Corp., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5247-0181
Shaelyn LaurieRIWI Corp., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leah MoncadaRIWI Corp., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Leo F WeaklandCenter for Global Health Innovation, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
James V LaveryHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Daniel A SalmonInstitute for Vaccine Safety, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Walter A OrensteinHubert Department of Global Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Robert F BreimanCenter for Global Health Innovation, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7099-2936

Funding

NCIRD CDC HHS U38 IP000873
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Various efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates have been employed in the United States. We sought to rapidly investigate public reactions to these efforts to increase vaccination, including self-reported responses to widespread reduced masking behavior, monetary incentive programs to get vaccinated, and work vaccination requirements. Using a unique method for data collection (Random Domain Intercept Technology), we captured a large (N = 14,152), broad-based sample of the United States Web-using population (data collected from June 30 -July 26, 2021). About 3/4 of respondents reported being vaccinated. The likelihood of vaccination and vaccination intention differed across various demographic indicators (e.g., gender, age, income, political leaning). We observed mixed reactions to efforts aimed at increasing vaccination rates among unvaccinated respondents. While some reported that specific efforts would increase their likelihood of getting vaccinated (between 16% and 32%), others reported that efforts would decrease their likelihood of getting vaccinated (between 17% and 42%). Reactions differed by general vaccination intention, as well as other demographic indicators (e.g., race, education). Our results highlight the need to fully understand reactions to policy changes, programs, and mandates before they are communicated to the public and employed. Moreover, the results emphasize the importance of understanding how reactions differ across groups, as this information can assist in targeting intervention efforts and minimizing potentially differential negative impact.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesHumansIntentionMasksUnited StatesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35446922
PMCPMC9022841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.