Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446889›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Long-term persistence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein-specific and neutralizing antibodies in recovered COVID-19 patients.

Jira Chansaenroj, Ritthideach Yorsaeng, Jiratchaya Puenpa, Nasamon Wanlapakorn, Chintana Chirathaworn, Natthinee Sudhinaraset, Manit Sripramote, Piti Chalongviriyalert, Supunee Jirajariyavej, Phatharaporn Kiatpanabhikul and 13 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jira ChansaenrojFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Ritthideach YorsaengFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0001-9391-663X
Jiratchaya PuenpaFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Nasamon WanlapakornFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chintana ChirathawornFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natthinee SudhinarasetFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Manit SripramoteMedical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Piti ChalongviriyalertMedical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Supunee JirajariyavejTaksin Hospital, Medical Service Department, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Phatharaporn KiatpanabhikulMedical Service Department, Charoenkrung Pracharak Hospital, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jatuporn SaiyarinMedical Service Department, Klang General Hospital, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chulikorn SoudonMedical Service Department, Sirindhorn Hospital, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Orawan ThienfaideeMedical Service Department, Ratchaphiphat Hospital, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Thitisan Palakawong Na AyuthayaHealth Department, Public Health Center 28, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chantapat BrukesawanHealth Department, Public Health Center 26, Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Duangnapa IntharasongkrohNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Dootchai ChaiwanichsiriNational Blood Center, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Mila IssarasongkhramDepartment of Disease Control, Institute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rungrueng KitphatiDepartment of Disease Control, Institute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Anek MungaomklangDepartment of Disease Control, Institute for Urban Disease Control and Prevention, Ministry of Public Health, Bangkok, Thailand.
Arunee ThitithanyanontFaculty of Science, Department of Microbiology, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-9756-4763
Pijaya NagavajaraOffice of the Permanent Secretary for the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration, Bangkok, Thailand.
Yong PoovorawanFaculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Center of Excellence in Clinical Virology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2337-6807
Bangkok Metropolitan Administration · THChulalongkorn University · THMinistry of Public Health · THThai Red Cross Society · THMahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding antibody responses after natural severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection can guide the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine schedule, especially in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to assess the dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, including anti-spike protein 1 (S1) immunoglobulin (Ig)G, anti-receptor-binding domain (RBD) total Ig, anti-S1 IgA, and neutralizing antibody against wild-type SARS-CoV-2 over time in a cohort of patients who were previously infected with the wild-type SARS-CoV-2. Between March and May 2020, 531 individuals with virologically confirmed cases of wild-type SARS-CoV-2 infection were enrolled in our immunological study. Blood samples were collected at 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-months post symptom onset or detection of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR (in asymptomatic individuals). The neutralizing titers against SARS-CoV-2 were detected in 95.2%, 86.7%, 85.0%, and 85.4% of recovered COVID-19 patients at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after symptom onset, respectively. The seropositivity rate of anti-S1 IgG, anti-RBD total Ig, anti-S1 IgA, and neutralizing titers remained at 68.6%, 89.6%, 77.1%, and 85.4%, respectively, at 12 months after symptom onset. We observed a high level of correlation between neutralizing and SARS-CoV-2 spike protein-specific antibody titers. The half-life of neutralizing titers was estimated at 100.7 days (95% confidence interval = 44.5-327.4 days, R2 = 0.106). These results support that the decline in serum antibody levels over time in both participants with severe disease and mild disease were depended on the symptom severity, and the individuals with high IgG antibody titers experienced a significantly longer persistence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibody responses than those with lower titers.

Indexed as

COVID-19SARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralCOVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GSpike Glycoprotein, Coronavirusspike protein, SARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35446889
PMCPMC9022880
OpenAlexW4225483617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.