Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446870›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2022

The cost of oral cancer: A systematic review.

Rejane Faria Ribeiro-Rotta, Eduardo Antônio Rosa, Vanessa Milani, Nadielle Rodrigues Dias, Danielle Masterson, Everton Nunes da Silva, Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio Zara

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. The economic burden of Chagas disease: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2023
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rejane Faria Ribeiro-RottaSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3267-5745
Eduardo Antônio RosaSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Vanessa MilaniSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Nadielle Rodrigues DiasSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.
Danielle MastersonUniversidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Everton Nunes da SilvaUniversidade de Brasília (UnB), Brasília, Federal District, Brazil.
Ana Laura de Sene Amâncio ZaraSchool of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Goiás (UFG), Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7012-9078

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although clinical and epidemiological aspects of oral cancers (OC) are well-documented in the literature, there is a lack of evidence on the economic burden of OC. This study aims to provide a comprehensive systematic assessment on the economic burden of OC based on available evidence worldwide. A systematic review was conducted. The population was any individual, who were exposed to OC, considered here as lip (LC), oral cavity (OCC), or oropharynx (OPC) cancer. The outcome was information on direct (medical and non-medical) and indirect (productivity loss and early death) costs. The data sources included Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane, BVS, and NHS EED. A search of grey literature (ISPOR and INAHTA proceedings) and a manual search in the reference lists of the included publications were performed (PROSPERO no. CRD42020172471). We identified 24 studies from 2001 to 2021, distributed by 15 countries, in 4 continents. In some developed western countries, the costs of LC, OCC, and OPC reached an average of Gross Domestic Product per capita of 18%, 75%, and 127%, respectively. Inpatient costs for OC and LC were 968% and 384% higher than those for outpatients, respectively. Advanced cancer staging was more costly (from ~22% to 373%) than the early cancer staging. The economic burden of oral cancer is substantial, though underestimated.

Indexed as

Lip NeoplasmsMouth NeoplasmsHumans

Identifiers

PMID35446870
PMCPMC9022815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.