Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446861›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

A simple model considering spiking probability during extracellular axon stimulation.

Frank Rattay, Thomas Tanzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Inference of Electrical Stimulation Sensitivity from Recorded Activity of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Frank RattayInstitute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-2819-8827
Thomas TanzerInstitute of Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29650
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spiking probability of an electrically stimulated axon as a function of stimulus amplitude increases in a sigmoidal dependency from 0 to 1. However, most computer simulation studies for neuroprosthetic applications calculate thresholds for neural targets with a deterministic model and by reducing the sigmoid curve to a step function, they miss an important information about the control signal, namely how the spiking efficiency increases with stimulus intensity. Here, this spiking efficiency is taken into account in a compartment model of the Hodgkin Huxley type where a noise current is added in every compartment with an active membrane. A key parameter of the model is a common factor knoise which defines the ion current fluctuations across the cell membrane for every compartment by its maximum sodium ion conductance. In the standard model Gaussian signals are changed every 2.5 μs as a compromise of accuracy and computational costs. Additionally, a formula for other noise transmission times is presented and numerically tested. Spiking probability as a function of stimulus intensity can be approximated by the cumulative distribution function of the normal distribution with RS = σ/μ. Relative spread RS, introduced by Verveen, is a measure for the spread (normalized by the threshold intensity μ), that decreases inversely with axon diameter. Dynamic range, a related measure used in neuroprosthetic studies, defines the intensity range between 10% and 90% spiking probability. We show that (i) the dynamic range normalized by threshold is 2.56 times RS, (ii) RS increases with electrode-axon distance and (iii) we present knoise values for myelinated and unmyelinated axon models in agreement with recoded RS data. The presented method is applicable for other membrane models and can be extended to whole neurons that are described by multi-compartment models.

Indexed as

AxonsModels, NeurologicalAction PotentialsComputer SimulationProbability

Identifiers

PMID35446861
PMCPMC9022861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.