Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446843›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2022

Reconstructing the history of helminth prevalence in the UK.

Hannah Ryan, Patrik G Flammer, Rebecca Nicholson, Louise Loe, Ben Reeves, Enid Allison, Christopher Guy, Inés Lopez Doriga, Tony Waldron, Don Walker and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
14.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Hannah RyanPalaeoBARN, Wellcome Trust Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Patrik G FlammerDepartment of Zoology, Peter Medawar Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca NicholsonOxford Archaeology Ltd., Janus House, Osney Mead, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Louise LoeOxford Archaeology Ltd., Janus House, Osney Mead, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ben ReevesYork Archaeological Trust, York, United Kingdom.
Enid AllisonCanterbury Archaeological Trust Ltd., Canterbury, United Kingdom.
Christopher GuyWorcester Cathedral, Chapter Office, Worcester, United Kingdom.
Inés Lopez DorigaWessex Archaeology, Portway House, Old Sarum Park, Salisbury, United Kingdom.
Tony WaldronInstitute of Archaeology, University College London, Gower Street, London, United Kingdom.
Don WalkerMuseum of London Archaeology (MOLA), Mortimer Wheeler House, London, United Kingdom.
Claas KirchhelleUniversity College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Greger LarsonPalaeoBARN, Wellcome Trust Palaeogenomics & Bio-Archaeology Research Network, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Adrian L SmithDepartment of Zoology, Peter Medawar Building, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7657-6191
University of Oxford · GBOxford Archaeology · GBCanterbury Archaeological Trust · GBMuseum of London Archaeology · GBUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity College London · GBYork Archaeological Trust · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/K004468/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N023803/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intestinal helminth parasites (worms) have afflicted humans throughout history and their eggs are readily detected in archaeological deposits including at locations where intestinal parasites are no longer considered endemic (e.g. the UK). Parasites provide valuable archaeological insights into historical health, sanitation, hygiene, dietary and culinary practices, as well as other factors. Differences in the prevalence of helminths over time may help us understand factors that affected the rate of infection of these parasites in past populations. While communal deposits often contain relatively high numbers of parasite eggs, these cannot be used to calculate prevalence rates, which are a key epidemiological measure of infection. The prevalence of intestinal helminths was investigated through time in England, based on analysis of 464 human burials from 17 sites, dating from the Prehistoric to Industrial periods. Eggs from two faecal-oral transmitted nematodes (Ascaris sp. and Trichuris sp.) and the food-derived cestodes (Taenia spp. and Diphyllobothrium latum syn Dibothriocephalus latus) were identified, although only Ascaris was detected at a high frequency. The changing prevalence of nematode infections can be attributed to changes in effective sanitation or other factors that affect these faecal-oral transmitted parasites and the presence of cestode infections reflect dietary and culinary preferences. These results indicate that the impact of helminth infections on past populations varied over time, and that some locations witnessed a dramatic reduction in parasite prevalence during the industrial era (18th-19th century), whereas other locations continued to experience high prevalence levels. The factors underlying these reductions and the variation in prevalence provide a key historical context for modern anthelmintic programs.

Indexed as

DiphyllobothriumHelminthiasisHelminthsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticAnimalsAscarisFecesPrevalenceUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID35446843
PMCPMC9022885
OpenAlexW4224293927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.