Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446494›Full record

ReviewJournal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG2022

The spectrum of melanocytic nevi and their clinical implications.

Nina Frischhut, Bernhard Zelger, Fiona Andre, Bettina Gudrun Zelger

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft = Journal of the German Society of Dermatology : JDDG, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Dermatofibroma: Reappraisal and Updated Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Nina FrischhutDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria.
Bernhard ZelgerDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria.
Fiona AndreDepartment of Dermatology, Venereology, and Allergology, Medical University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria.
Bettina Gudrun ZelgerInstitute of Pathology, Medical University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria.
University Hospital Innsbruck · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude of the topic of melanocytic nevi (MN) is directly related to its relevance in everyday clinical work. The different MN have different prognostic significance in regard to comorbidity and possible risk of transformation. In addition to the criteria of the ABCDE rule, relevant criteria in the assessment of an MN are the time of occurrence, the growth tendency, the distribution and the comparison with other MN of the respective individual. The present CME article provides an overview of the knowledge that has been gained with regard to the development and genetic background of MN and any risk of degeneration that may exist. In addition, certain clinical and/or dermatoscopic features may provide the clinician with a decision-making aid in the management of different MNs.

Indexed as

MelanomaNevus, PigmentedSkin NeoplasmsHumansPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID35446494
PMCPMC9320830
OpenAlexW4224250148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.