ArticlePathogens and disease2022
The importance of mentors and how to handle more than one mentor.
Article in Pathogens and disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Addressing structural mentoring barriers in postdoctoral training: a qualitative study.Studies in graduate and postdoctoral education · 2025Article
- Diversity, equity, and inclusion in a polarized world: Navigating challenges and opportunities in STEMM.Molecular biology of the cell · 2024Article
- The graduate school guide: How to prepare for the qualifying exam and assemble a thesis/graduate committee.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- Speaking up for the invisible minority: First-generation students in higher education.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- How to design a broad mindfulness program: One approach to introducing mindfulness to a STEM community within a university setting.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- Running a successful STEMM summer program: A week-by-week guide.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- A review of undergraduate research programs aimed at underrepresented students.STAR protocols · 2024Review
- A workshop to showcase the diversity of scientists to middle school students.Advances in physiology education · 2024Article
- A guide to establishing, implementing, and optimizing diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA) committees.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2024Article
- Project Strengthen: An STEMM-focused career development workshop to prepare underrepresented minority students for graduate school.iScience · 2023Article
- How to be a GREAT mentor.Advances in physiology education · 2023Article
- A practical guide to graduate school interviewing for historically excluded individuals.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2023Article
- Strategies for change: thriving as an individual with a disabilty in STEMM.Pathogens and disease · 2023Article
- Recognizing and addressing environmental microaggressions, know-your-place aggression, peer mediocrity, and code-switching in STEMM.Frontiers in education · 2023Article
- Post-secondary student perspectives about how to support student resilience.Cogent mental health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Working with multiple mentors is a critical way for students to expand their network, gain opportunities, and better prepare for future scholastic or professional ventures. However, students from underrepresented groups (UR) are less likely to be mentored or have access to mentors, particularly in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. We developed and implemented a workshop, to provide the necessary foundation for students to be better prepared for establishing future mentorships throughout graduate and professional school. Faculty well-versed in the area of effective mentorship from multiple universities developed and delivered a 1.5-hour workshop to address the roles of a mentor, especially when it comes to UR students, and how students may effectively work with multiple mentors. This workshop was delivered to a group of students from, the Historically Black College and University (HBCU), Winston-Salem State University, and a pre/post-10-point Likert scale-based survey was administered where 1 represented strongly disagree and 10 was strongly agree. The questions used in this seminar were newly designed by the authors as program evaluations. We analyzed the raw data with nonparametric tests for comparison within paired samples. Wilcoxon matched-pairs and signed-rank tests showed statistically significant growth in student self-ratings related to the workshop learning objectives. The 'How to Handle More than One Mentor to Achieve Excellence' workshop was well-received as a component of pregraduate and preprofessional training. Incorporating workshops like this may increase student preparedness around developing and cultivating healthy mentorship relationships throughout STEM training.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.