ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2022
First clinical application of a novel T1 mapping of the whole brain.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Abdominal TMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Comparison of brain volumetry in patients with non-lesional epilepsy on 3 and 7 T MPRAGE.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Microstructural imaging of brain changes in schizophrenia via quantitative T1 (qT1): a preliminary comparison of two acquisition protocols.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2025Article
- Study Protocol of a Prospective Phase 2 Study of Chlorophyllin for the Management of Brain Radionecrosis in Patients With Diffuse Glioma (CHROME).Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a robust MRI-based nomogram incorporating radiomics and deep features for preoperative glioma grading: a multi-center study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Association of cervical artery stenosis with common cerebral microvascular lesions and coronary artery calcifications.Frontiers in neuroimaging · 2025Article
- Article
- Differentiation between multifocal CNS lymphoma and glioblastoma based on MRI criteria.Discover oncology · 2024Article
- Differentiation of multiple brain metastases and glioblastoma with multiple foci using MRI criteria.BMC medical imaging · 2024Article
- Automated brain segmentation and volumetry in dementia diagnostics: a narrative review with emphasis on FreeSurfer.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2024Review
- Brainstem atrophy in dementia with Lewy bodies compared with progressive supranuclear palsy and Parkinson's disease on MRI.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Non-Invasive Intracranial Pressure Monitoring.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Brain Volume Loss After Stereotactic Laser Interstitial Thermal Therapy in Patients With Temporal Lobe Epilepsy.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
- Characterization of patient-derived site-specificNeuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe aim of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and clinical value of the novel single-shot T1 mapping method for rapid and accurate multi-slice coverage of the whole brain, described by Wang et al. 2015.
methodsAt a field strength of 3 Tesla, T1 mappings of 139 patients (51 of them without pathologic findings) and two repeats of five volunteers were performed at 0.5 mm in-plane resolution. Mean T1 values were determined in 18 manually segmented regions-of-interest without pathologic findings. Reproducibility of the repeated scans was calculated using mean coefficient of variations. Pathologies were grouped and separately evaluated.
resultsThe mean age of the cohort was 49 (range 1-95 years). T1 relaxation times for ordinary brain and pathologies were in accordance with the literature values. Intra- and inter-subject reproducibility was excellent, and mean coefficient of variations were 2.4% and 3.8%, respectively. DISCUSSION: The novel rapid T1 mapping method is a reliable magnetic resonance imaging technique for identifying and quantifying normal brain structures and may thus serve as a basis for assessing pathologies. The fast and parallel online calculation enables a comfortable use in everyday clinical practice. We see a possible clinical value in a large spectrum of diseases, which should be investigated in further studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.