Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446074›Full record

ArticleDevelopmental psychology2022

Intersensory matching of faces and voices in infancy predicts language outcomes in young children.

Elizabeth V Edgar, James Torrence Todd, Lorraine E Bahrick

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Developmental psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relations Between Preferential Looking to Synchronous Audiovisual Speech and Expressive Language in Infants With Autistic and Non-Autistic Siblings.Mind, brain and education : the official journal of the International Mind, Brain, and Education Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Intersensory processing of faces and voices at 6 months predicts language outcomes at 18, 24, and 36 months of age.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Plasticity in older infants' perception of phonetic contrasts: The role of selective attention in context.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elizabeth V EdgarDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0003-4419-1876
James Torrence ToddDepartment of Psychology.
Lorraine E BahrickDepartment of Psychology.ORCID 0000-0002-4126-7065

Funding

Intersensory Processing, Developmental Trajectories, and Longitudinal OutcomesR01HD053776 · NICHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI Lorraine E Bahrick · 2008 to 2026
$8.8M
Multisensory Development: New Measures and a Collaborative DatabaseR01HD094803 · NICHD · FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY · PI BAHRICK, LORRAINE E · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
National Institute of Child Health and Human DevelopmentNICHD NIH HHS R01 HD053776NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD094803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parent language input is a well-established predictor of child language development. Multisensory attention skills (MASks; intersensory matching, shifting and sustaining attention to audiovisual speech) are also known to be foundations for language development. However, due to a lack of appropriate measures, individual differences in these skills have received little research focus. A newly established measure, the Multisensory Attention Assessment Protocol (MAAP), allows researchers to examine predictive relations between early MASks and later outcomes. We hypothesized that, along with parent language input, multisensory attention to social events (faces and voices) in infancy would predict later language outcomes. We collected data from 97 children (predominantly White and Hispanic, 48 males) participating in an ongoing longitudinal study assessing 12-, 18-, and 24-month MASks (MAAP) and parent language input (quality, quantity), and 18- and 24-month language outcomes (child speech production, vocabulary size). Results revealed 12-month intersensory matching (but not maintaining or shifting attention) of faces and voices in the presence of a distractor was a strong predictor of language. It predicted a variety of 18- and 24-month child language outcomes (expressive vocabulary, child speech production), even when holding traditional predictors constant: parent language input and SES (maternal education: 52% bachelor's degree or higher). Further, at each age, parent language input predicted just one outcome, expressive vocabulary, and SES predicted child speech production. These novel findings reveal infant intersensory matching of faces and voices in the presence of a distractor can predict which children might benefit most from parent language input and show better language outcomes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

LanguageLanguage DevelopmentChildChild LanguageChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleVocabulary

Identifiers

PMID35446074
PMCPMC9587533
OpenAlexW4224223946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.