Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35446009›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2022

Comparison of scoring systems regarding the gender as a parameter with the traditional scoring systems for predicting appendicitis.

Recayi Capoglu, Emre Gonullu, Zulfu Bayhan, Murat Coskun, Tarık Harmantepe, Furkan Kucuk

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Association of Sex, Age, and Inflammatory Cell Counts with Complicated Acute Appendicitis.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Recayi CapogluGeneral Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4438-4301
Emre GonulluGeneral Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-4414
Zulfu BayhanFaculty of Medicine, General Surgery Department, Sakarya University, Sakarya, Turkey. zulfubayhan@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7587-7267
Murat CoskunGeneral Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6361-913X
Tarık HarmantepeGeneral Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2888-7646
Furkan KucukGeneral Surgery Department, Sakarya University Training and Research Hospital, Sakarya, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2558-9144
Sakarya University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although acute appendicitis remains the most common cause of acute abdomen in General Surgery practice, negative appendectomy rates are still high in particularly female patients. Appendicitis scoring systems considering gender can help the clinician to reduce negative appendectomy rates in females. This present study aims to compare the Lintula, Ripasa, Fenyo-Lindberg scoring systems, which use gender as a variable, with the Alvarado, Karaman, scoring systems to evaluate which CSS is more successful in the differential diagnosis of appendicitis in females. We analyzed the records of the patients operated on with a prediagnosis of acute appendicitis in our clinic between 2020 and 2021, retrospectively. Alvarado, adult appendicitis score (AAS), appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIRS), Ripasa, Karaman, Lintula, and Fenyo Lindberg scores were calculated for each patient. The patients were divided into two groups as male and female, according to gender. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to identify the best cut-off value and assess the performance of the test score for appendicitis. Three hundred and sixty-three patients were included in the study. One hundred seventy-two (47.4%) of the patients were male, and 191 (52.6%) were female. Alvarado and AAS were the most valuable score in female (AUC: 0.805, sensitivity: 0.63, specificity: 0.83; and area under curve (AUC): 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively), male group (AUC: 0.828, Sensitivity: 0.71, Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.834, Sensitivity 0.74, Specificity: 0.77, respectively), and when patients were not categorized by gender (AUC: 0.818, Sensitivity: 0.67 Specificity: 0.83; and AUC: 0.794, Sensitivity 0.71, Specificity: 0.76, respectively). Although the Alvarado scoring system is the first defined appendicitis scoring system, it seems as superior to the many scoring systems defined after it in predicting appendicitis, even in female patients.

Indexed as

AppendicitisAcute DiseaseAdultAppendectomyFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAdult appendicitisAlvaradoAppendicitisAppendicitis inflammatory responseFenyo-LindbergGenderKaramanLintulaScore

Identifiers

PMID35446009
PMCPMC9022019
OpenAlexW4224280459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.