Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445990›Full record

Trial reportInflammopharmacology2022

Imrecoxib versus celecoxib as postoperative analgesia for patients receiving arthroscopic knee surgery: a randomized, controlled, non-inferiority study.

Wei Guo, Ying Liu, Jingjing Li

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Inflammopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Imrecoxib: Advances in Pharmacology and Therapeutics.Drug design, development and therapy · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Wei Guo *Department of Anesthesiology, Daqing Oil Field General Hospital, Daqing, 163000, Heilongjiang, China.
Ying Liu *Department of Anesthesiology, Daqing Oil Field General Hospital, Daqing, 163000, Heilongjiang, China.
Jingjing LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Southern University of Science and Technology Hospital, No. 6019 Liuxian Avenue, Xili Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, 518055, Guangdong, China. jinglun9984274058@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0072-1142
Daqing Oilfield General Hospital · CNSouthern University of Science and Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveImrecoxib is a novel cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor independently developed in China, which exhibits a good efficacy and tolerance in orthopedic disorders. The current study aimed to further compare its efficacy and safety with celecoxib as postoperative analgesia in arthroscopic knee surgery (AKS).

methodsPatients receiving AKS were enrolled and randomly assigned to imrecoxib (n = 64) and celecoxib (n = 62) group to receive analgesia for 72 h after surgery. Pain at rest and movement, pethidine consumption, patient's satisfaction, Lysholm score, and adverse events were assessed after AKS. Meanwhile the upper limit of 95% CI of pain-score mean difference (MD) between imrecoxib and celecoxib was calculated, then, the non-inferiority was defined if the all-time-point upper limits of 95% CI less than 1.

resultsImrecoxib was non-inferior to celecoxib for alleviating pain at rest (upper limit of 95% CI of MD ranging from 0.443 to 0.782, all time-point values less than 1); as well as for attenuating pain at movement (upper limit of 95% CI of MD ranging from 0.398 to 0.582, all time-point values less than 1). Moreover, rescue analgesia rate (P = 0.583), pethidine consumption (P = 0.454), patient's satisfaction at 72 h (P = 0.408), and Lysholm score at M3 (P = 0.776) were of no difference between imrecoxib group and celecoxib group. Additionally, the main adverse events in two groups were nausea (P = 0.425), constipation (P = 1.000), vomiting (P = 0.715), headache (P = 1.000), and dizziness (P = 0.667), which were mild and manageable.

conclusionImrecoxib is non-inferior to celecoxib in postoperative analgesia and exhibits an acceptable tolerance in patients undergoing AKS.

Indexed as

AnalgesiaPostoperative PainCelecoxibHumansMeperidinePyrrolesSulfidesCelecoxibImrecoxibMeperidinePyrrolesSulfidesAdverse eventsAnalgesicArthroscopic knee surgeryCelecoxibImrecoxib

Identifiers

PMID35445990
OpenAlexW4224243372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.