ReviewJournal of general internal medicine2022
Reimagining the Clinical Competency Committee to Enhance Education and Prepare for Competency-Based Time-Variable Advancement.
Review in Journal of general internal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The CBHPE Outcomes Theory of Change: An International Consensus Statement on the Mechanisms and Outcomes of Competency-Based Education in the Health Professions.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- CORE-HPE Reporting Guidelines: Standardizing Reporting for Competency-Based Health Professions Education Outcomes Research.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Implementing the Promotion in Place Model of Competency-Based Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education in Pathology.Journal of graduate medical education · 2025Article
- A Perspective on Promotion in Place and Competency-Based, Time-Variable Graduate Medical Education.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Article
- Staffing Patterns of Non-ACGME Fellowships with 4-Year Residency Programs: A National Survey.The western journal of emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Competence By Design: a transformational national model of time-variable competency-based postgraduate medical education.Perspectives on medical education · 2024Article
- Interventional Pulmonary Fellowship Training: End of the Beginning.ATS scholar · 2023Article
- Using learning analytics in clinical competency committees: Increasing the impact of competency-based medical education.Medical education online · 2023Article
- Competency-based medical education in the United States: What the otolaryngologist needs to know.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2023Review
- Reimagining Gastroenterology Fellowship Training: The Third Year of the Future.Gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Accelerating medical education with ChatGPT: an implementation guide.MedEdPublish (2016) · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular Critical Care Training: A Collaboration between Intensivists and Cardiologists.ATS scholar · 2022Article
- Gender differences in emergency medicine resident assessment: A scoping review.AEM education and training · 2022Article
- Cost and Challenges of Clinical Competency Committees and Milestones Assessment.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Assessing residents and clinical fellows is a high-stakes activity. Effective assessment is important throughout training so that identified areas of strength and weakness can guide educational planning to optimize outcomes. Assessment has historically been underemphasized although medical education oversight organizations have strengthened requirements in recent years. Growing acceptance of competency-based medical education and its logical extension to competency-based time-variable (CB-TV) graduate medical education (GME) further highlights the importance of implementing effective evidence-based approaches to assessment. The Clinical Competency Committee (CCC) has emerged as a key programmatic structure in graduate medical education. In the context of launching a multi-specialty pilot of CB-TV GME in our health system, we have examined several program's CCC processes and reviewed the relevant literature to propose enhancements to CCCs. We recommend that all CCCs fulfill three core goals, regularly applied to every GME trainee: (1) discern and describe the resident's developmental status to individualize education, (2) determine readiness for unsupervised practice, and (3) foster self-assessment ability. We integrate the literature and observations from GME program CCCs in our institutions to evaluate how current CCC processes support or undermine these goals. Obstacles and key enablers are identified. Finally, we recommend ways to achieve the stated goals, including the following: (1) assess and promote the development of competency in all trainees, not just outliers, through a shared model of assessment and competency-based advancement; (2) strengthen CCC assessment processes to determine trainee readiness for independent practice; and (3) promote trainee reflection and informed self-assessment. The importance of coaching for competency, robust workplace-based assessments, feedback, and co-production of individualized learning plans are emphasized. Individual programs and their CCCs must strengthen assessment tools and frameworks to realize the potential of competency-oriented education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.