Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445861›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2022

Pupillary responses to differences in luminance, color and set size.

Julia Oster, Jeff Huang, Brian J White, Ralph Radach, Laurent Itti, Douglas P Munoz, Chin-An Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Julia OsterDepartment of General and Biological Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Jeff HuangCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Room 234, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Brian J WhiteCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Room 234, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ralph RadachDepartment of General and Biological Psychology, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Laurent IttiDepartment of Computer Science, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Douglas P MunozCentre for Neuroscience Studies, Queen's University, Room 234, Botterell Hall, 18 Stuart Street, Kingston, ON, K7L 3N6, Canada. doug.munoz@queensu.ca.
Chin-An WangInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, College of Health Science and Technology, National Central University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan. joshwang@ncu.edu.tw.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-7701
Queen's University · CAUniversity of Wuppertal · DENational Central University · TWUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

CIHR MOP-FDN-148418ministry of science and technology, taiwan 110-2636-H-038-005ministry of science and technology, taiwan 111-2628-H-008-003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pupil responds to a salient stimulus appearing in the environment, in addition to its modulation by global luminance. These pupillary responses can be evoked by visual or auditory stimuli, scaled with stimulus salience, and enhanced by multisensory presentation. In addition, pupil size is modulated by various visual stimulus attributes, such as color, area, and motion. However, research that concurrently examines the influence of different factors on pupillary responses is limited. To explore how presentation of multiple visual stimuli influences human pupillary responses, we presented arrays of visual stimuli and systematically varied their luminance, color, and set size. Saliency level, computed by the saliency model, systematically changed with set size across all conditions, with higher saliency levels in larger set sizes. Pupillary constriction responses were evoked by the appearance of visual stimuli, with larger pupillary responses observed in larger set size. These effects were pronounced even though the global luminance level was unchanged using isoluminant chromatic stimuli. Furthermore, larger pupillary constriction responses were obtained in the blue, compared to other color conditions. Together, we argue that both cortical and subcortical areas contribute to the observed pupillary constriction modulated by set size and color.

Indexed as

LightPupilHumansPhotic StimulationOrientingPupil light reflexPupillometrySaliencySuperior colliculusV1

Identifiers

PMID35445861
OpenAlexW4224266603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.