Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445745›Full record

ArticleJournal of the experimental analysis of behavior2022

Machine learning with a snapshot of data: Spiking neural network 'predicts' reinforcement histories of pigeons' choice behavior.

Anna Plessas, Josafath I Espinosa-Ramos, Dave Parry, Sarah Cowie, Jason Landon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna PlessasAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1616-4048
Josafath I Espinosa-RamosAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Dave ParryAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.
Sarah CowieUniversity of Auckland, New Zealand.
Jason LandonAuckland University of Technology, New Zealand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An accumulated body of choice research has demonstrated that choice behavior can be understood within the context of its history of reinforcement by measuring response patterns. Traditionally, work on predicting choice behaviors has been based on the relationship between the history of reinforcement-the reinforcer arrangement used in training conditions-and choice behavior. We suggest an alternative method that treats the reinforcement history as unknown and focuses only on operant choices to accurately predict (more precisely, retrodict) reinforcement histories. We trained machine learning models known as artificial spiking neural networks (SNNs) on previously published pigeon datasets to detect patterns in choices with specific reinforcement histories-seven arranged concurrent variable-interval schedules in effect for nine reinforcers. Notably, SNN extracted information from a small 'window' of observational data to predict reinforcer arrangements. The models' generalization ability was then tested with new choices of the same pigeons to predict the type of schedule used in training. We examined whether the amount of the data provided affected the prediction accuracy and our results demonstrated that choices made by the pigeons immediately after the delivery of reinforcers provided sufficient information for the model to determine the reinforcement history. These results support the idea that SNNs can process small sets of behavioral data for pattern detection, when the reinforcement history is unknown. This novel approach can influence our decisions to determine appropriate interventions; it can be a valuable addition to our toolbox, for both therapy design and research.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorColumbidaeAnimalsMachine LearningNeural Networks, ComputerReinforcement Scheduleartificial intelligencechoice researchmachine learning predictionreinforcement historyspiking neural networks

Identifiers

PMID35445745
PMCPMC9320819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.