ArticleMolecular medicine reports2022
[Corrigendum] miR‑647 and miR‑1914 promote cancer progression equivalently by downregulating nuclear factor IX in colorectal cancer.
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Subsequently to the publication of this paper, an interested reader drew to the authors' attention that, in the scratch‑wound assays shown in Fig. 3A on p. 8195, the data shown for the '0 h/NC' and '0 h/miR‑1914 antagomir' data panels appeared to be strikingly similar, such that they may have been derived from the same original source. The authors have consulted their original data, and realize that the '0 h/miR‑1914 antagomir' data panel was inadvertently selected incorrectly for Fig. 3A. The corrected version of Fig. 3, now showing the correct data for the '0 h/miR‑1914 antagomir' data panel in Fig. 3A, is shown on the next page. Note that the errors in Fig. 3 did not significantly affect the results or the conclusions reported in this paper, and all the authors agree to this Corrigendum. The authors are grateful to the Editor of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.