Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445726›Full record

ArticleJournal of the National Cancer Institute2022

Pancreatic Ductal Carcinoma Risk Associated With Hereditary Cancer-Risk Genes.

Anna Gardiner, John Kidd, Maria C Elias, Kayla Young, Brent Mabey, Nassim Taherian, Shelly Cummings, Mokenge Malafa, Eric Rosenthal, Jennifer B Permuth

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Hereditary cancer syndromes.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna GardinerMyriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
John KiddMyriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1174-6388
Maria C EliasMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Kayla YoungMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Brent MabeyMyriad Genetics, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Nassim TaherianMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Shelly CummingsMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6901-9664
Mokenge MalafaDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Eric RosenthalMyriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0930-9683
Jennifer B PermuthDepartments of Cancer Epidemiology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Moffit Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
Myriad Genetics · USMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Novel Therapy to Inhibit IPMN ProgressionR01CA263575 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI BATRA, SURINDER K., MALAFA, MOKENGE P. · 2022 to 2024
$2.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA263575
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough several hereditary cancer predisposition genes have been implicated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) susceptibility, gene-specific risks are not well defined and are potentially biased because of the design of previous studies. More precise and unbiased risk estimates can result in screening and prevention better tailored to genetic findings.

methodsThis is a retrospective analysis of 676 667 individuals, 2445 of whom had a personal diagnosis of PDAC, who received multigene panel testing between 2013 and 2020 from a single laboratory. Clinical data were obtained from test requisition forms. Multivariable logistic regression models determined the increased risk of PDAC because of pathogenic variants (PVs) in various genes as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariable odds ratios were adjusted for age, personal and/or family cancer history, and ancestry.

resultsOverall, 11.1% of patients with PDAC had a PV. Statistically significantly elevated PDAC risk (2-sided P < .05) was observed for CDK2NA (p16INK4a) (OR = 8.69, 95% CI = 4.69 to 16.12), ATM (OR = 3.44, 95% CI = 2.58 to 4.60), MSH2 (OR = 3.17, 95% CI = 1.70 to 5.91), PALB2 (OR = 3.09, 95% CI = 2.02 to 4.74), BRCA2 (OR = 2.55, 95% CI = 1.99 to 3.27), and BRCA1 (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 1.07 to 2.43).

conclusionsThis study provides PDAC risk estimates for 6 genes commonly included in multigene panel testing for hereditary cancer risk. These estimates are lower than those from previous studies, possibly because of adjustment for family history, and support current recommendations for germline testing in all PDAC patients, regardless of a personal or family history of cancer.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalPancreatic NeoplasmsGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenetic TestingGerm-Line MutationHumansRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35445726
PMCPMC9275755
OpenAlexW4224223090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.