Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445706›Full record

ArticleGenetics2022

DnaA and SspA regulation of the iraD gene of Escherichia coli: an alternative DNA damage response independent of LexA/RecA.

Thalia H Sass, Alexander E Ferrazzoli, Susan T Lovett

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The DNA damage response ofProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  5. Mapping theMicrobiology (Reading, England) · 2024
    Article
  6. RpoS and the bacterial general stress response.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thalia H SassDepartment of Biology, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7048-8564
Alexander E FerrazzoliDepartment of Biology, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.
Susan T LovettDepartment of Biology, Rosenstiel Basic Medical Sciences Research Center, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA 02454-9110, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2792-1857
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Replication Fork RepairR01GM051753 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1994 to 2025
$10.7M
GENETIC AND BIOCHEMICAL MECHANISMS OF REGULATIONT32GM007122 · NIGMS · BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY · PI LOVETT, SUSAN THOMAS · 1985 to 2020
$7.5M
National Institute of General Medical Science R01 GM51753NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM051753NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007122
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transcription factor RpoS of Escherichia coli controls many genes important for tolerance of a variety of stress conditions. IraD promotes the post-translation stability of RpoS by inhibition of RssB, an adaptor protein for ClpXP degradation. We have previously documented DNA damage induction of iraD expression, independent of the SOS response. Both iraD and rpoS are required for tolerance to DNA damaging treatments such as H2O2 and the replication inhibitor azidothymidine in the log phase of growth. Using luciferase gene fusions to the 672 bp iraD upstream region, we show here that both promoters of iraD are induced by azidothymidine. Genetic analysis suggests that both promoters are repressed by DnaA-ATP, partially dependent on a putative DnaA box at -81 bp and are regulated by regulatory inactivation of DnaA, dependent on the DnaN processivity clamp. By electrophoretic mobility shift assays, we show that purified DnaA protein binds to the iraD upstream region, so DnaA regulation of IraD is likely to be direct. DNA damage induction of iraD during log phase growth is abolished in the dnaA-T174P mutant, suggesting that DNA damage, in some way, relieves DnaA repression, possibly through the accumulation of replication clamps and enhanced regulatory inactivation of DnaA. We also demonstrate that the RNA-polymerase associated factor, stringent starvation protein A, induced by the accumulation of ppGpp, also affects iraD expression, with a positive effect on constitutive expression and a negative effect on azidothymidine-induced expression.

Indexed as

Bacterial ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsDNA ReplicationGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHydrogen PeroxideLexA Repressor ProteinRec A RecombinasesSerine EndopeptidasesSigma FactorZidovudineBacterial ProteinsDnaA protein, BacteriaDNA-Binding ProteinsEscherichia coli ProteinsHydrogen PeroxideLexA Repressor ProteinrecA protein, E coliRec A RecombinasesSerine EndopeptidasesSigma FactorSspA protein, E coliZidovudinegeneral stress responseppGppreplicationRpoSstringent response

Identifiers

PMID35445706
PMCPMC9157160
OpenAlexW4226160421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.