Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445520›Full record

Trial reportPsychology and psychotherapy2022

The service user experience of SlowMo therapy: A co-produced thematic analysis of service users' subjective experience.

Kathryn E Greenwood, Megha Gurnani, Tom Ward, Evelin Vogel, Claire Vella, Alison McGourty, Sam Robertson, Catarina Sacadura, Amy Hardy, Mar Rus-Calafell and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychology and psychotherapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. The impact of Patient and Public Involvement in the SlowMo study: Reflections on peer innovation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. E-Mental Health Interventions in Inpatient Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Public involvement in chronic respiratory diseases research: A qualitative study of patients', carers' and citizens' perspectives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Kathryn E GreenwoodSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Megha GurnaniSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Tom WardDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Evelin VogelSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Claire VellaSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Alison McGourtySussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Sam RobertsonSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Catarina SacaduraSussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK.
Amy HardyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Mar Rus-CalafellSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Nicola CollettOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
Richard EmsleyDepartment of Biostatistics and Health Informatics, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Daniel FreemanOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
David FowlerSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Elizabeth KuipersDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Paul BebbingtonDivision of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
Graham DunnCentre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Daniel MichelsonSchool of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
Philippa GaretyDepartment of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
SlowMo Patient, Public Involvement (PPI) team
Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College London · GBOxford Health NHS Foundation Trust · GBSouth London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Sussex · GBManchester Academic Health Science Centre · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSlowMo is the first blended digital therapy for paranoia, showing significant small-moderate reductions in paranoia in a recent large-scale randomized controlled trial (RCT). This study explored the subjective service-user experience of the SlowMo therapy content and design; the experience of the blended therapy approach, including the triangle of the therapeutic alliance; and the experience of the digital aspects of the intervention.

designQualitative co-produced sub-study of an RCT.

methodsParticipants were 22 adult service users with schizophrenia-spectrum psychosis and persistent distressing paranoia, who completed at least one SlowMo therapy session and a 24-week follow-up, at one of 3 sites in Oxford, London, and Sussex, UK. They were interviewed by peer researchers, using a topic guide co-produced by the Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) team. The transcribed data were analysed thematically. Multiple coding and triangulation, and lay peer researcher validation were used to reach a consensus on the final theme structure.

resultsSix core themes were identified: (i) starting the SlowMo journey; (ii) the central role of the supportive therapist; (iii) slowing things down; (iv) value and learning from social connections; (v) approaches and challenges of technology; and (vi) improvements in paranoia and well-being.

conclusionsFor these service users, slowing down for a moment was helpful, and integrated into thinking over time. Learning from social connections reflected reduced isolation, and enhanced learning through videos, vignettes, and peers. The central role of the supportive therapist and the triangle of alliance between service user, therapist, and digital platform were effective in promoting positive therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaTherapeutic AllianceAdultHumansParanoid DisordersPatient ParticipationResearch Designcognitive behaviour therapyparanoiapatient andpsychosispublic involvementqualitativereasoningschizophrenia-spectrumservice user experiencethematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID35445520
PMCPMC9873386
OpenAlexW4224222576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.