Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445514›Full record

SynthesisJournal of midwifery & women's health2022

Pregnant People's Perspectives On Cannabis Use During Pregnancy: A Systematic Review and Integrative Mixed-Methods Research Synthesis.

Meredith Vanstone, Janelle Panday, Anuoluwa Popoola, Shipra Taneja, Devon Greyson, Sarah D McDonald, Rachael Pack, Morgan Black, Beth Murray-Davis, Elizabeth Darling

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of midwifery & women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. The impact of cannabinoids on reproductive function.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reasons for cannabis use during pregnancy and lactation: a qualitative study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Meredith VanstoneDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7347-6259
Janelle PandayDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anuoluwa PopoolaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Shipra TanejaDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Devon GreysonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-4860-384X
Sarah D McDonaldDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Rachael PackCenter for Education Research and Innovation, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Morgan BlackDepartment of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Beth Murray-DavisDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Elizabeth DarlingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
McMaster University · CAImpact · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRates of perinatal cannabis use are rising, despite clinical evidence about the potential for harm. Accordingly, pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from cannabis use may have a difficult time making informed decisions about cannabis use.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review of mixed-methods research to synthesize existing knowledge on the perspectives of pregnant people and their partners about cannabis use in pregnancy. Six health and social science databases were searched up until May 30, 2021. There were no methodological, time, or geographic limits applied. We employed a convergent integrative approach to the inductive analysis of findings from all studies.

resultsWe identified 26 studies describing views of 17,781 pregnant and postpartum people about cannabis use in pregnancy. No studies describing the views of partners were identified, and only one study specifically addressed the perspectives of lactating people. Comparative analysis revealed that whether cannabis was studied alone or grouped with other substances resulted in significant diversity in descriptions of participant decision-making priorities and perceptions of risks and benefits. Studies of cannabis alone demonstrated a complex decision-making process whereby perceived benefits are balanced against the available information about risk, which is often unclear and uncertain. Clear and helpful information was difficult to identify, and health care providers were not described as a helpful and trusted resource for decision-making. DISCUSSION: Decision-making about cannabis use is difficult for pregnant and lactating people who perceive a benefit from this use, although this decisional difficulty is seldom reflected in studies that examine cannabis as one of multiple substances that pregnant or lactating people may use. Our review suggests several approaches clinicians may take to encourage open and supportive conversations to facilitate informed decisions about cannabis use during the perinatal period.

Indexed as

CannabisCommunicationFemaleHumansLactationParturitionPostpartum PeriodPregnancycannabisintegrative reviewlactationmixed-methodspregnancysystematic review

Identifiers

PMID35445514
PMCPMC9324983
OpenAlexW4224281413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.