Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445501›Full record

ReviewPlant biotechnology journal2022

The plant epitranscriptome: revisiting pseudouridine and 2'-O-methyl RNA modifications.

Muthusamy Ramakrishnan, K Shanmugha Rajan, Sileesh Mullasseri, Sarin Palakkal, Krishnan Kalpana, Anket Sharma, Mingbing Zhou, Kunnummal Kurungara Vinod, Subbiah Ramasamy, Qiang Wei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plant biotechnology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emerging roles of non-mNature plants · 2026
    Review
  2. Epigenetic Regulation of Floral Transition.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. ExploringHorticulture research · 2024
    Article
  6. Detection, distribution, and functions of RNAFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 3 countries.

Muthusamy RamakrishnanCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7819-339X
K Shanmugha RajanThe Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and Advanced Materials and Nanotechnology Institute, Bar-Ilan University, 52900, Ramat-Gan, Israel.ORCID 0000-0003-4826-9802
Sileesh MullasseriSchool of Ocean Science and Technology, Kerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies, Cochin, India.
Sarin PalakkalThe Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-6819-2956
Krishnan KalpanaDepartment of Plant Pathology, Agricultural College and Research Institute, Tamilnadu Agricultural University, 625 104, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Anket SharmaState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Mingbing ZhouState Key Laboratory of Subtropical Silviculture, Zhejiang A&F University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5674-4410
Kunnummal Kurungara VinodDivision of Genetics, ICAR - Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
Subbiah RamasamyCardiac Metabolic Disease Laboratory, Department of Biochemistry, School of Biological Sciences, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-6828-9195
Qiang WeiCo-Innovation Center for Sustainable Forestry in Southern China, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.ORCID 0000-0001-5180-2087
Nanjing Forestry University · CNZhejiang A & F University · CNBar-Ilan University · ILHebrew University of Jerusalem · ILIndian Agricultural Research Institute · INKerala University of Fisheries and Ocean Studies · INMadurai Kamaraj University · INTamil Nadu Agricultural University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is growing evidence that post-transcriptional RNA modifications are highly dynamic and can be used to improve crop production. Although more than 172 unique types of RNA modifications have been identified throughout the kingdom of life, we are yet to leverage upon the understanding to optimize RNA modifications in crops to improve productivity. The contributions of internal mRNA modifications such as N6-methyladenosine (m

Indexed as

PseudouridineTranscriptome5-MethylcytosinePlantsRNARNA Processing, Post-Transcriptional5-MethylcytosinePseudouridineRNA2′-O-methylationepitranscriptomicsnext-generation sequencingpseudouridineRNA modifications

Identifiers

PMID35445501
PMCPMC9241379
OpenAlexW4224223019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.