Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445471›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2022

Erenumab in chronic migraine: Experience from a UK tertiary centre and comparison with other real-world evidence.

Modar Khalil, David Moreno-Ajona, María Dolores Villar-Martínez, Fiona Greenwood, Jan Hoffmann, Peter J Goadsby

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Observational
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Non-invasive neuromodulation of the cervical vagus nerve in rare primary headaches.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Modar KhalilNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7178-4725
David Moreno-AjonaNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0366-5994
María Dolores Villar-MartínezNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Fiona GreenwoodNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Jan HoffmannNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2103-9081
Peter J GoadsbyNational Institute for Health Research-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility, King's College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3260-5904
National Institute for Health Research · GBKing's College London · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeChronic migraine is a highly disabling primary headache disorder that is the most common diagnosis of patients seen at tertiary headache centres. Typical oral preventive therapies are associated with many limitations that impact their therapeutic utility. Erenumab was the first available calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibody in the UK. It had proven efficacy in migraine prevention in clinical trials and limited real-world data in tertiary settings.

methodsWe audited our first 92 patients (n = 73 females) with severely disabling chronic migraine who were given monthly erenumab 70 mg sc for 6 months between December 2018 and December 2019.

resultsAt 3 months, monthly migraine days were significantly reduced by a median of 4 days, and all other variables also showed significant improvement. The improvement was not affected by baseline analgesic use status. More than half of our patients experienced a clinically meaningful improvement in migraine days. No serious adverse events were reported.

conclusionsOur real-world data with erenumab demonstrate it is effective and well tolerated in managing patients with chronic migraine in a tertiary care setting.

Indexed as

Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistsMigraine DisordersAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedFemaleHumansTreatment OutcomeUnited KingdomAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedCalcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Receptor AntagonistserenumabCGRP-mABchronic migraineerenumabmigrainereal-world experience

Identifiers

PMID35445471
PMCPMC9545124
OpenAlexW4224234068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.