Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445355›Full record

ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2022

Outcomes following sacrocolpopexy using ultralight and lightweight mesh.

Mugdha Kulkarni, Daniel L Rolnik, James Alexander, Francesca McGannon, Yizhen Amy Liu, Anna Rosamilia

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urogynecology journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mugdha KulkarniMonash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia. doc.mugdha@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5129-158X
Daniel L RolnikMonash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
James AlexanderMonash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Francesca McGannonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Yizhen Amy LiuMonash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Anna RosamiliaMonash Health, 246 Clayton Road, Melbourne, Victoria, 3168, Australia.
Monash Health · AUMonash University · AUUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introduction and hypothesisThis study reports the long-term anatomic and subjective outcomes following sacrocolpopexy based on mesh weight and provides device-specific data.

methodsThis cohort study compared ultra-lightweight (≤ 20 g/m

resultsOf 358 women who met inclusion criteria, 220 (61%) agreed to attend for review; 95 (43%) had ultra-lightweight mesh and 125 (57%) had lightweight mesh including Upsylon

conclusionsUltra-lightweight mesh appears to have similar incidence rate of failure compared to lightweight mesh. Upsylon

Indexed as

Pelvic Organ ProlapseCohort StudiesFemaleGynecologic Surgical ProceduresHumansSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeVaginaLong-term outcomesMesh weightProlapseSacrocolpopexy

Identifiers

PMID35445355
PMCPMC9020419
OpenAlexW4224224973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.