Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445322›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract2022

Access to Surgery and Quality of Care for Acute Cholecystitis During the COVID-19 Pandemic in 2020 and 2021 - an Analysis of 12,545 Patients from a German-Wide Hospital Network.

Robert Siegel, Sven Hohenstein, Stefan Anders, Martin Strik, Ralf Kuhlen, Andreas Bollmann

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert SiegelFaculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany. robert.siegel@helios-gesundheit.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1259-2379
Sven HohensteinHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Stefan AndersDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Martin StrikDepartment of General, Visceral and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Schwanebecker Chaussee 50, 13125, Berlin, Germany.
Ralf KuhlenHelios Health, Berlin, Germany.
Andreas BollmannHeart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig and Leipzig Heart Institute, Leipzig, Germany.
Helios Hospital Berlin-Buch · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DEWitten/Herdecke University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine effects on admission, treatment, and outcome for acute cholecystitis during the course of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 and 2021.

methodsRetrospective analysis of claims data from 74 German hospitals. Study periods were defined from March 5, 2020 (start of first wave) to June 20, 2021 (end of third wave) and compared to corresponding control periods (March 2018 to February 2020). All in-patients with acute cholecystitis were included. Distribution of cases, type of surgery, comorbidities, surgical outcome, and length of stay of all cases with acute cholecystitis and cholecystectomy were compared. In addition, we analyzed the type of treatment (non-surgical, cholecystostomy, or cholecystectomy) for all cases with main diagnosis of acute cholecystitis.

resultsWe could not demonstrate differences in daily admissions over the course of the pandemic (11.2-12.7 patients vs. 11.9-12.6 patients for control periods). Proportion of patients with non-surgical treatment was low and not increased (11.7-17.3% vs. 14.5-18.4%). Cholecystostomy was rare throughout all periods (0-0.5% of all patients). We did not observe an increase in open surgery (proportion of open cholecystectomies 3.4-5.5%). Mortality was generally low (1.5-1.9%) with no differences between periods. Median length of stay was 4 days throughout all periods.

conclusionThe numerous restrictions during the COVID-19 pandemic did not result in an increase of admissions or surgery for acute cholecystitis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been safely applied during the pandemic. Our results may assure the ability to maintain high quality of surgical care even in times of disruptions to the health care system.

Indexed as

Cholecystectomy, LaparoscopicCholecystitis, AcuteCholecystostomyCOVID-19HospitalsHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAcute cholecystitisCOVID-19Emergency surgeryLaparoscopic cholecystectomyMorbidity and mortality

Identifiers

PMID35445322
PMCPMC9020554
OpenAlexW4224273372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.