Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445220›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence reports2022

Individual-, peer-, and parent-level substance use-related factors among 9- and 10-year-olds from the ABCD Study: Prevalence rates and sociodemographic differences.

Meghan E Martz, Mary M Heitzeg, Krista M Lisdahl, Christine C Cloak, Sarah W Feldstein Ewing, Raul Gonzalez, Frank Haist, Kimberly H LeBlanc, Pamela A Madden, J Megan Ross and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of peer influence in shaping developmental trajectories of substance use expectancies in early adolescence.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2026
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Longitudinal analysis of the ABCD® study.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Meghan E MartzDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Mary M HeitzegDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Krista M LisdahlDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Christine C CloakDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sarah W Feldstein EwingDepartment of Psychology, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI, USA.
Raul GonzalezDepartment of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Frank HaistDepartment of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Kimberly H LeBlancDivision of Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Pamela A MaddenDepartment of Psychiatry, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
J Megan RossDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Kenneth J SherDepartment of Psychology, University of Missouri, MO, USA.
Susan F TapertDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Wesley K ThompsonDivision of Biostatistics and Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
Natasha E WadeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
University of California San Diego · USUniversity of Michigan · USFlorida International University · USNational Institute on Drug Abuse · USUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USUniversity of Missouri · USUniversity of Rhode Island · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Milwaukee · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

ABCD-USA Consortium: Coordinating CenterU24DA041147 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI SANDRA A BROWN, TERRY L. JERNIGAN · 2015 to 2026
$54.7M
ABCD-USA Consortium: Research ProjectU01DA041106 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Mary M Heitzeg, Chandra Sekhar Sripada · 2015 to 2026
$24.9M
Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Prospective Research in Studies of Maturation (PRISM) ConsortiumU01DA041117 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI LINDA CHANG, THOMAS M ERNST · 2015 to 2026
$19.5M
Changes in cognition and psychiatric disorder symptoms during cannabis abstinence using a novel discordant twin designK23DA054212 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI ROSS, JESSICA MEGAN · 2021 to 2025
$1.0M
Developmental and sex differences in modulation of nucleus accumbens activationK01AA027558 · NIAAA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI MARTZ, MEGHAN ELIZABETH · 2019 to 2023
$826k
NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA027558NIDA NIH HHS K23 DA054212NIDA NIH HHS L30 DA054523NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041106NIDA NIH HHS U01 DA041117NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA041147
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although a relatively large body of research has identified multiple factors associated with adolescent substance use, less is known about earlier substance-related factors during preadolescence, including curiosity to use substances. The present study examined individual-, peer-, and parent-level domains pertaining to substance use and how these domains vary by sociodemographic subgroups and substance type. Methods: Participants were 11,864 9- and 10-year-olds from the baseline sample of the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. Youth-reported measures were curiosity to use substances and perceived peer substance use. Parent-reported measures were availability of and rules about substances. Generalized logistic mixed models (GLMM) were used to compare these measures across alcohol, nicotine, and marijuana and across sociodemographic subgroupings (sex, race/ethnicity, household income, and family history of alcohol problems). GLMM was then used to examine predictors of curiosity to use by substance type. Results: The most striking descriptive differences were found between race/ethnicity and income categories (e.g., positive associations between greater income and greater availability of alcohol). In multivariable analyses, greater curiosity to use alcohol was associated with being male, higher household income, perceived peer alcohol use, and easy alcohol availability; greater curiosity to use nicotine was associated with being male, perceived peer cigarette use, easy availability of cigarettes, and no parental rules about cigarette use. Conclusions: This study identified substance use-related individual-, peer-, and parent-level factors among a diverse, national sample. Findings highlight the importance of considering sociodemographic and substance-specific variability and may help identify risk and protective factors preceding adolescent substance use.

Indexed as

ABCD StudyAlcoholMarijuanaNicotineParentsPeers

Identifiers

PMID35445220
PMCPMC9015678
OpenAlexW4214824988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.