Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445173›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of breast health2022

The Comparative Frequency of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema Determined by Bioimpedance Spectroscopy and Circumferential Measurements.

Pınar Borman, Ayşegül Yaman, Lütfi Doğan, Ayşe Arıkan Dönmez, Esra Gizem Koyuncu, Ayşegül Balcan, Sercan Aksoy, Cihangir Özaslan, Rabiye Akın, Kaniye Üneş

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of breast health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Shoulder proprioception changes in postmastectomy patients: an observational study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Pınar BormanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Ankara City Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1212-6797
Ayşegül YamanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8097-4208
Lütfi DoğanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3834-0911
Ayşe Arıkan DönmezHacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4893-9335
Esra Gizem KoyuncuDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5072-7756
Ayşegül BalcanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3649-7648
Sercan AksoyDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4984-1049
Cihangir ÖzaslanDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Abdurrahman Yurtaslan Ankara Oncology Training and Research Hospital, University of Health Sciences Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2611-4837
Rabiye AkınHacettepe University Faculty of Nursing, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0358-5425
Kaniye ÜneşDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8249-9615
Hacettepe University · TRAnkara Onkoloji Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi · TRSağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The survival of patients with breast cancer has prolonged due to early diagnosis and modern methods of treatment and lymphedema has become the most important morbidity secondary to the treatment of the disease. Early detection and timely intervention have potential to reduce advanced breast cancer-related lymphedema. The aims of this study were to comparatively determine the frequency of subclinical/clinical lymphedema by using prospective monitoring with bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) and circumferential measurements in a group of patients who underwent breast cancer surgery. Materials and Methods: Patients having breast cancer surgery were recruited between October 2018 and December 2019. Demographical and surgical properties were recorded. Extremity volumes by circumferential and BIS measurements were performed after surgery (baseline) and monitorizations were carried out at third and sixth months, in order to determine the frequency of subclinical/clinical lymphedema. L-Dex value of >6.5 was recently taken attention as subclinical lymphedema and values >7 were considered as clinical lymphedema. The presence of subclinical and clinic lymphedema was assessed by inter-limb volume difference (>5% and >10 respectively) based on the serial circumferential measurements in both affected and non-affected extremities. The functional status and quality of Life (QoL) were determined by quick-DASH and LYMQOL-Arm questionnaires respectively. The relationship between volume measurements, functional status and QoL scores were determined. Results: Eighty-two female patients with a mean age of 49.6 years were included to the study. 30 (36.5%) and 21 (25.6%) of patients were determined as having subclinical/clinical lymphedema by BIS, while 18 (21.9%) and 19 (23.1%) of patients had subclinical/clinical lymphedema by circumferentialmeasurements at third-and-sixth months respectively. The functional and QoL scores were not correlated with circumferential volume measurements and BIS scores. There was a moderate-high correlation with BIS and circumferential measurements. Conclusion: In conclusion 36.5% and 25.6% of our study group had subclinical and clinical lymphedema by BIS respectively during the 6 months surveillance period. Periodic monitoring of women with BIS allows early detection for lymphedema in more patients than in circumferential volume measurements, which may have implications for timely and necessary management.

Indexed as

Bioempedance spectroscopybreast cancercircumferential volume measurementlymphedemaquality-of-lifeTurkish

Identifiers

PMID35445173
PMCPMC8987859
OpenAlexW4221096042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.