ArticleProceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems2021
A Deep Clustering Method For Analyzing Uterine Cervix Images Across Imaging Devices.
Article in Proceedings. IEEE International Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrating artificial intelligence with smartphone-based imaging for cancer detection in vivo.Biosensors & bioelectronics · 2025Review
- Self-supervised based clustering for retinal optical coherence tomography images.Eye (London, England) · 2025Article
- Optical imaging for screening and early cancer diagnosis in low-resource settings.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2024Article
- Data Characterization for Reliable AI in Medicine.Recent trends in image processing and pattern recognition : 5th International Conference, RTIP2R 2022, Kingsville, TX, USA, December 01-02, 2022, revised selected papers. International Conference on Recent Trends in Image Processing and... · 2023Article
- Comparison of accuracy and reproducibility of colposcopic impression based on a single image versus a two-minute time series of colposcopic images.Gynecologic oncology · 2022Article
- An emerging paradigms on cervical cancer screening methods and devices for clinical trails.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Improvement method for cervical cancer detection: A comparative analysis.Oncology research · 2021Review
- Content-based medical image retrieval: a survey of applications to multidimensional and multimodality data.Journal of digital imaging · 2013Review
- A unified set of analysis tools for uterine cervix image segmentation.Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA), though error prone, has long been used for screening women and to guide management for cervical cancer. The automated visual evaluation (AVE) technique, in which deep learning is used to predict precancer based on a digital image of the acetowhitened cervix, has demonstrated its promise as a low-cost method to improve on human performance. However, there are several challenges in moving AVE beyond proof-of-concept and deploying it as a practical adjunct tool in visual screening. One of them is making AVE robust across images captured using different devices. We propose a new deep learning based clustering approach to investigate whether the images taken by three different devices (a common smartphone, a custom smartphone-based handheld device for cervical imaging, and a clinical colposcope equipped with SLR digital camera-based imaging capability) can be well distinguished from each other with respect to the visual appearance/content within their cervix regions. We argue that disparity in visual appearance of a cervix across devices could be a significant confounding factor in training and generalizing AVE performance. Our method consists of four components: cervix region detection, feature extraction, feature encoding, and clustering. Multiple experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of each component and compare alternative methods in each component. Our proposed method achieves high clustering accuracy (97%) and significantly outperforms several representative deep clustering methods on our dataset. The high clustering performance indicates the images taken from these three devices are different with respect to visual appearance. Our results and analysis establish a need for developing a method that minimizes such variance among the images acquired from different devices. It also recognizes the need for large number of training images from different sources for robust device-independent AVE performance worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.