Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445140›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2022

Application of Vagus Nerve Branch Preservation in Thoracoscopic Surgery for Early-Stage Lung Cancer.

Xiangzheng Liu, Zhimao Chen, Shijie Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Oncologic Safety of Omitting Mediastinal Lymph Node Dissection in Segmentectomy for Ground-Glass Opacity-Dominant Lung Cancer: A Supplementary Analysis of JCOG1211.European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiangzheng LiuDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3757-0907
Zhimao ChenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Shijie ZhangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China.
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In this study, we introduced a novel surgical strategy to protect vagal nerve branches during radical thoracoscopic surgery in right lung cancer and explored the effects of vagal nerve branch preservation. Methods: We retrospectively studied 53 patients with right-sided lung cancer with clinically staged T1N0M0 between 2019 and 2020. All 53 patients were treated with total thoracoscopic lobectomy and mediastinal lymph node dissection in the same number of lymph node stations. Of these, 22 patients adopted a vagus nerve branch protection strategy during lymph node dissection. Another 31 patients were treated with traditional lymph node dissection as the control group. Results: The characteristics of the patients were similar between the two groups. The operation time and intraoperative bleeding in the protection group were longer than those in the control group. However, the protection group had a lower average postoperative pain score and average postoperative hospital stay. The above difference was not statistically significant. Three cases of arrhythmia occurred in the protection group, including 1 case of tachycardia and 2 cases of atrial fibrillation. In the control group, 13 cases of arrhythmia occurred after the operation, including 8 cases of tachycardia and 5 cases of atrial fibrillation. We also tracked changes in the patients' heart rates throughout the treatment process (excluding patients with arrhythmias). An increased heart rate was observed postoperatively in both groups, but the increase of heart rate of the protection group was smaller than that of the control group; however, the difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions: A vagus nerve branch preservation-based approach to radical surgery is a safe and feasible strategy for right lung cancer treatment, which could significantly reduce the risk of postoperative arrhythmia in patients and may also have a potential role in reducing the length of hospital stay and maintaining heart rate stability in the postoperative period.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationLung NeoplasmsHumansLymph Node ExcisionRetrospective StudiesThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedThoracoscopyVagus Nerve

Identifiers

PMID35445140
PMCPMC9015860
OpenAlexW4223425576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.