Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35445124›Full record

ArticleJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research2022

Acaricide resistance of Rhipicephalus decoloratus ticks collected from communal grazing cattle in South Africa.

Mandla Yawa, Nkululeko Nyangiwe, Ishmael Festus Jaja, Munyaradzi Christopher Marufu, Charles T Kadzere

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Acaricide Resistance Development inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mandla YawaDepartment of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
Nkululeko NyangiweDöhne Agricultural Development Institute, Stutterheim, South Africa.
Ishmael Festus JajaDepartment of Livestock and Pasture Science, University of Fort Hare, Alice, South Africa.
Munyaradzi Christopher MarufuDepartment of Veterinary Tropical Diseases, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
Charles T KadzereDöhne Agricultural Development Institute, Stutterheim, South Africa.
University of Fort Hare · ZAStutterheim Provincial Hospital · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of South Africa · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to determine acaricide resistance in Materials and Methods: A sample of 20-30 adult engorged female Results: This study found that most ticks were susceptible to exposure to different acaricide field concentrations of amidines (49% at 250 ppm), OPs (33% and 47% at 300 ppm and 500 ppm, respectively), and SPs (44% and 23% at 150 ppm and 300 ppm, respectively). The resistance testing results showed no resistance to amidines at any localities and no resistance to OP in the Senqu region. However, resistance development of the larvae to amines, OPs, and SPs was extensively observed in Senqu (18%, 6%, and 7%), Elundini (15%, 15%, and 17%), and Walter Sisulu (13%, 19%, and 9%) regions, respectively. Conclusions: The larvae's resistance is a cause for worry. Hence, the continuous monitoring of tick resistance to commonly used acaricides will help mitigate widespread acaricidal resistance and sustain livestock productivity.

Indexed as

Acaricide resistancecattleRhipicephalus decoloratus larvaeShaw larval immersion test

Identifiers

PMID35445124
PMCPMC8985892
OpenAlexW4224316092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.