ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Comparison of Visual Outcomes Between Toric Intraocular Lenses and Clear Corneal Incisions to Correct Astigmatism in Image-Guided Cataract Surgery.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Toric Versus non-toric intraocular lenses for pre-existing corneal astigmatism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Innovations and Outcomes in Astigmatism Correction During Cataract Surgery: A Comprehensive Review.Cureus · 2024Review
- Extended depth of focus IOL in eyes with different axial myopia and targeted refraction.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Article
- Managing low corneal astigmatism in patients with presbyopia correcting intraocular lenses: a narrative review.BMC ophthalmology · 2023Review
- Efficacy of image-guided accurate limbal relaxing incisions for astigmatism correction during cataract surgery.Advances in ophthalmology practice and researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To compare the astigmatism correction effects of toric intraocular lenses (IOL) and clear corneal incisions during image-guided cataract surgery. Methods: All patients with regular corneal astigmatism of 0.75-1.5 D underwent cataract surgery and astigmatism correction using the Callisto eye image-guided system. One group had implantation of an AcrySof toric IOL. Another group had implantation of aspheric IOL with 3.0 mm single clear corneal incision (SCCI) on the steep axis. Uncorrected and best-corrected spectacle visual acuity, refraction, and toric IOL axis were evaluated at 1, 4, and 12 weeks postoperatively. Results: Sixty-eight eyes of 68 patients were included. The mean residual refractive cylinder was 0.34 ± 0.40 D in the toric group and 0.64 ± 0.57 D in the SCCI group. There were no significant differences in residual refractive cylinder, spherical equivalent, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), and best-corrected spectacle visual acuity (BCSVA) between groups. The percentage of the residual cylinder within ± 0.50 D was 75 and 56% for toric and SCCI cases, respectively ( Conclusions: Both toric IOL and SCCI can correct low and medium astigmatism effectively with the help of a precise image-guided system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.