Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444970›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022

Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Pediatric Achalasia: A Retrospective Analysis of 21 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.

Dongzi Peng, Yuyong Tan, Chenjie Li, Liang Lv, Hongyi Zhu, Chengbai Liang, Rong Li, Deliang Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Use of an adapted bronchoscope for peroral endoscopic myotomy in a pediatric patient weighing less than 10 kg.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Dongzi PengDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yuyong TanDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chenjie LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Liang LvDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Hongyi ZhuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Chengbai LiangDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Rong LiDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Deliang LiuDepartment of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
Central South University · CNSecond Xiangya Hospital of Central South University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising short-term safety and efficacy in pediatric patients, while long-term outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the clinical effects of POEM for pediatric achalasia who had a follow-up of at least 5 years. Methods: Pediatric patients from a single center who underwent a POEM between October 2011 and November 2016 were, respectively, collected and analyzed for long-term clinical outcomes. Patients were contacted to evaluate their current symptoms and encouraged repeat endoscopy and manometry. The clinical success, procedure-related parameters, adverse events, gastroesophageal reflux disease after POEM, and quality of life were evaluated. Results: A total of twenty-four patients who underwent POEM in our center were studied, with a mean age of 14.42 ± 2.65. Two of the 24 patients (8.3%) had previous treatment. The mean of the procedure time was 58.67 ± 19.10 min, 8.3% (2/24) of patients experienced perioperative adverse events. The current symptom scores were obtained from 21 patients at a mean follow-up of 92.57 months, the remainder were lost to follow-up after a mean of 38 months. Eckardt scores were significantly improved from preoperative baseline (preoperative 7.67 ± 1.62 vs. current 0.86 ± 1.28, Conclusion: POEM resulted in successful symptomatic mitigation in a majority of pediatric patients after 5 years. A multi-center large-scale, prospective study is necessary for a confirmed conclusion.

Indexed as

achalasiaendoscopic surgerylong-term outcomespediatricperoral endoscopic myotomyPOEM

Identifiers

PMID35444970
PMCPMC9013798
OpenAlexW4226134351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.