ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Pediatric Achalasia: A Retrospective Analysis of 21 Cases With a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Long-term outcomes of peroral endoscopic myotomy for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with median follow-up ≥ 5 years.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Pooled it
- Type II achalasia unmasked by EndoFLIP and high-resolution manometry in a child with eosinophilic esophagitis.JPGN reports · 2026Article
- Peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with achalasia: A review of the literature.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025Review
- Safety and efficacy of peroral endoscopic myotomy for treating achalasia in pediatric and geriatric patients: A meta-analysis.World journal of gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2024Article
- Use of an adapted bronchoscope for peroral endoscopic myotomy in a pediatric patient weighing less than 10 kg.VideoGIE : an official video journal of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · 2023Article
- Per-oral endoscopic myotomy is safe and effective for pediatric patients with achalasia: A long-term follow-up study.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic Heller myotomy versus peroral endoscopic myotomy in children with esophageal achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of gastroenterologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has shown promising short-term safety and efficacy in pediatric patients, while long-term outcomes are largely unknown. This study aimed to assess the clinical effects of POEM for pediatric achalasia who had a follow-up of at least 5 years. Methods: Pediatric patients from a single center who underwent a POEM between October 2011 and November 2016 were, respectively, collected and analyzed for long-term clinical outcomes. Patients were contacted to evaluate their current symptoms and encouraged repeat endoscopy and manometry. The clinical success, procedure-related parameters, adverse events, gastroesophageal reflux disease after POEM, and quality of life were evaluated. Results: A total of twenty-four patients who underwent POEM in our center were studied, with a mean age of 14.42 ± 2.65. Two of the 24 patients (8.3%) had previous treatment. The mean of the procedure time was 58.67 ± 19.10 min, 8.3% (2/24) of patients experienced perioperative adverse events. The current symptom scores were obtained from 21 patients at a mean follow-up of 92.57 months, the remainder were lost to follow-up after a mean of 38 months. Eckardt scores were significantly improved from preoperative baseline (preoperative 7.67 ± 1.62 vs. current 0.86 ± 1.28, Conclusion: POEM resulted in successful symptomatic mitigation in a majority of pediatric patients after 5 years. A multi-center large-scale, prospective study is necessary for a confirmed conclusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.