ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2022
Respiratory Oscillometry in Newborn Infants: Conventional and Intra-Breath Approaches.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory oscillometry in infants: present challenges and future opportunities.Paediatric respiratory reviews · 2026Review
- Intra-breath respiratory oscillometry in the first days of life in preterm infants: a prospective observational study.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Observational
- Interpretable machine learning methods based on oscillometry and electric modeling for the diagnostic of respiratory dysfunction in silicosis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Pulmonary function tests in the neonatal intensive care unit and beyond: a clinical review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Intra-breath respiratory mechanics of prematurity-associated lung disease phenotypes in school-aged children.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Oscillatory mechanics trajectory in very preterm infants: a cohort study.Pediatric research · 2023Observational
- Pulmonary sequelae in 2-year-old children after hospitalisation for respiratory syncytial virus lower respiratory tract infection during infancy: an observational study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2023Observational
- Normal values of respiratory oscillometry in South African children and adolescents.ERJ open research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Oscillometry has been employed widely as a non-invasive and standardized measurement of respiratory function in children and adults; however, limited information is available on infants. Aims: To establish the within-session variability of respiratory impedance (Zrs), to characterize the degree and profile of intra-breath changes in Zrs and to assess their impact on conventional oscillometry in newborns. Methods: 109 healthy newborns were enrolled in the study conducted in the first 5 postpartum days during natural sleep. A custom-made wave-tube oscillometry setup was used, with an 8-48 Hz pseudorandom and a 16 Hz sinusoidal signal used for spectral and intra-breath oscillometry, respectively. A resistance-compliance-inertance (R-C-L) model was fitted to average Zrs spectra obtained from successive 30-s recordings. Intra-breath measures, such as resistance (Rrs) and reactance (Xrs) at the end-expiratory, end-inspiratory and maximum-flow points were estimated from three 90-s recordings. All natural and artifact-free breaths were included in the analysis. Results: Within-session changes in the mean R, C and L values, respectively, were large (mean coefficients of variation: 10.3, 20.3, and 26.6%); the fluctuations of the intra-breath measures were of similar degree (20-24%). Intra-breath analysis also revealed large swings in Rrs and Xrs within the breathing cycle: the peak-to-peak changes amounted to 93% (range: 32-218%) and 41% (9-212%), respectively, of the zero-flow Zrs magnitude. Discussion: Intra-breath tracking of Zrs provides new insight into the determinants of the dynamics of respiratory system, and highlights the biasing effects of mechanical non-linearities on the average Zrs data obtained from the conventional spectral oscillometry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.