Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35444875›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural With Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Living Donor Hepatectomy.

Muhammad Zubair, Muhammad Adil Khan, Muhammad Nasir Ayub Khan, Sajida Iqbal, Muhammad Ashraf, Salman A Saleem

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151511 ("Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies."), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04151511 naunknown statusnot on this map

"Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies."

TypeinterventionalSponsorShifa Clinical Research CenterRan2019 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsPain, PostoperativeArmsContinuous Erector Spinae Plane Block
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Muhammad ZubairPain Management, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad Adil KhanAnaesthesiology, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad Nasir Ayub KhanAnaesthesia and Critical Care, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Sajida IqbalObstetrics and Gynaecology, Bio Vision Diagnostic Center, Islamabad, PAK.
Muhammad AshrafAnaesthesiology, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Salman A SaleemPain Management, Shifa International Hospital Islamabad, Islamabad, PAK.
Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission · PKShifa International Hospital · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used for pain management in donor hepatectomy. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer ultrasound-guided block described for the management of thoracic and abdominal pain. There is limited literature available comparing the two techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of continuous ESPB to continuous TEA in donor hepatectomy. METHODOLOGY: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04151511). A total of 82 patients undergoing donor hepatectomy between January 2020 and December 2020 were recruited, of whom 41 received TEA and 41 received ESPB. Randomization was done by the sealed opaque envelope method.

resultsThe mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores in donors who received TEA and ESPB in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.4 + 0.5; P = 0.02) at one hour (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.2 + 0.6; P = 0.008), six hours (1.8 + 0.9 vs. 0.8 + 0.5; P < 0.001), 12 hours (0.9 + 0.7 vs. 0.2 + 0.7; P < 0.001), and 24 hours (0.48 + 0.5 vs. 0.08 + 0.3; P < 0.001) were significantly different. Mean opioid consumption was 3.38 ± 6.24 mg in the ESPB group and 10.75 ± 9.64 mg in the TEA group (P < 0.001). Mean lung volume (MLV) at 24 hours in the TEA group and ESPB group was 1543 ml and 1815 ml (P < 0.001). MLV was 2545 ml in the TEA group and 2820 ml in the ESPB group at 48 hours (P < 0.001). Mean nausea and vomiting score at six hours was 0.1 vs. 0.03 (P = 0.02).

conclusion

Indexed as

epidural analgesiaespbhepatectomypain managementvas

Identifiers

PMID35444875
PMCPMC9010007
OpenAlexW4220687298

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.