ArticleCureus2022
Comparison of Continuous Thoracic Epidural With Erector Spinae Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Adult Living Donor Hepatectomy.
Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04151511 ("Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies."), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
"Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia Versus Continuous Erector Spinae Plane Block for Postoperative Analgesia in Patients Undergoing Adult Living Donar Open Hepatectomies."
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy of erector spinae plane block for postoperative analgesia after liver surgeries: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy of ultrasound guided erector spinae plane block compared to wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Trial
- Article
- Comparative Efficacy of Regional Analgesic Interventions in Open versus Laparoscopic Hepatic Surgery: A Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Analgesic efficacy of continuous ultrasound-guided unilateral erector spinae block and thoracic epidural analgesia in patients undergoing antero-lateral thoracotomy.World journal of methodology · 2025Article
- Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) enhances hemodynamic stability decreasing analgesic requirements in surgical stabilization of rib fractures (SSRFs).World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Article
- Post-Operative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia and Incidence of Major Complications according to Specific Safety Standardized Documentation: A Large Retrospective Dual Center Experience.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) is commonly used for pain management in donor hepatectomy. Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a newer ultrasound-guided block described for the management of thoracic and abdominal pain. There is limited literature available comparing the two techniques. The objective of this study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy and adverse effects of continuous ESPB to continuous TEA in donor hepatectomy. METHODOLOGY: The randomized controlled trial (RCT) was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04151511). A total of 82 patients undergoing donor hepatectomy between January 2020 and December 2020 were recruited, of whom 41 received TEA and 41 received ESPB. Randomization was done by the sealed opaque envelope method.
resultsThe mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores in donors who received TEA and ESPB in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.4 + 0.5; P = 0.02) at one hour (2.7 + 0.9 vs. 2.2 + 0.6; P = 0.008), six hours (1.8 + 0.9 vs. 0.8 + 0.5; P < 0.001), 12 hours (0.9 + 0.7 vs. 0.2 + 0.7; P < 0.001), and 24 hours (0.48 + 0.5 vs. 0.08 + 0.3; P < 0.001) were significantly different. Mean opioid consumption was 3.38 ± 6.24 mg in the ESPB group and 10.75 ± 9.64 mg in the TEA group (P < 0.001). Mean lung volume (MLV) at 24 hours in the TEA group and ESPB group was 1543 ml and 1815 ml (P < 0.001). MLV was 2545 ml in the TEA group and 2820 ml in the ESPB group at 48 hours (P < 0.001). Mean nausea and vomiting score at six hours was 0.1 vs. 0.03 (P = 0.02).
conclusion
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.